Cargando…
Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. CT is mainly asymptomatic. Test-and-treat strategies are widely implemented to prevent transmission and complications. Strategies are not without controversy in asymptomatic women and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2 |
_version_ | 1784669593350963200 |
---|---|
author | Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Evers, Ymke J. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Wolffs, Petra F. G. de Vries, Henry J. C. Hoenderboom, Bernice van der Sande, Marianne A. B. Heijne, Janneke Klausner, Jeffrey D. Hocking, Jane S. van Bergen, Jan |
author_facet | Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Evers, Ymke J. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Wolffs, Petra F. G. de Vries, Henry J. C. Hoenderboom, Bernice van der Sande, Marianne A. B. Heijne, Janneke Klausner, Jeffrey D. Hocking, Jane S. van Bergen, Jan |
author_sort | Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. CT is mainly asymptomatic. Test-and-treat strategies are widely implemented to prevent transmission and complications. Strategies are not without controversy in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Concerns are emerging to test and treat asymptomatic persons for urogenital CT (‘Controversy 1’) and pharyngeal or rectal CT (‘Controversy 2’), whereby testing symptomatic persons is not under debate. Opposed views in CT treatment involve using azithromycin versus doxycycline (‘Controversy 3’). The objective of this review is to provide coverage of these public health and clinical controversies by reviewing the current scientific evidence. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed for relevant publications between 2018 and September 2021, and iterative retrieval of additional relevant publications. RESULTS: Controversy 1. In women, the majority of asymptomatic CT are at the urogenital site, and detections mostly include viable CT. CT easily transmits to a partner and potentially also between the vaginal and rectal areas; the clinical impact of urogenital CT is established, although risks for adverse outcomes are uncertain. Wide-scale testing in asymptomatic women has not resulted in reduced prevalence. In MSM, evidence for the clinical impact of asymptomatic urogenital CT is lacking. Controversy 2. Rectal CT is common in women diagnosed with urogenital CT, but the clinical impact of asymptomatic rectal CT is uncertain. In MSM, rectal CT is common, and most CT infections are at the rectal site, yet the risk of longer term complications is unknown. In both sexes, pharyngeal CT is uncommon and has no documented clinical impact. Controversy 3. In the treatment of rectal CT, doxycycline has superior effectiveness to azithromycin. Evidence has also accumulated on the harms of test-and-treat strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Current practices vary widely, from widescale test-and-treat approaches to more individual patient- and partner-level case management. Choosing which asymptomatic people to test at what anatomic site, and whether to test or not, requires an urgent (re-)definition of the goals of testing and treating asymptomatic persons. Treatment guidelines are shifting toward universal doxycycline use, and clinical practice now faces the challenge of implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8922931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89229312022-03-23 Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Evers, Ymke J. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Wolffs, Petra F. G. de Vries, Henry J. C. Hoenderboom, Bernice van der Sande, Marianne A. B. Heijne, Janneke Klausner, Jeffrey D. Hocking, Jane S. van Bergen, Jan BMC Infect Dis Review BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. CT is mainly asymptomatic. Test-and-treat strategies are widely implemented to prevent transmission and complications. Strategies are not without controversy in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Concerns are emerging to test and treat asymptomatic persons for urogenital CT (‘Controversy 1’) and pharyngeal or rectal CT (‘Controversy 2’), whereby testing symptomatic persons is not under debate. Opposed views in CT treatment involve using azithromycin versus doxycycline (‘Controversy 3’). The objective of this review is to provide coverage of these public health and clinical controversies by reviewing the current scientific evidence. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed for relevant publications between 2018 and September 2021, and iterative retrieval of additional relevant publications. RESULTS: Controversy 1. In women, the majority of asymptomatic CT are at the urogenital site, and detections mostly include viable CT. CT easily transmits to a partner and potentially also between the vaginal and rectal areas; the clinical impact of urogenital CT is established, although risks for adverse outcomes are uncertain. Wide-scale testing in asymptomatic women has not resulted in reduced prevalence. In MSM, evidence for the clinical impact of asymptomatic urogenital CT is lacking. Controversy 2. Rectal CT is common in women diagnosed with urogenital CT, but the clinical impact of asymptomatic rectal CT is uncertain. In MSM, rectal CT is common, and most CT infections are at the rectal site, yet the risk of longer term complications is unknown. In both sexes, pharyngeal CT is uncommon and has no documented clinical impact. Controversy 3. In the treatment of rectal CT, doxycycline has superior effectiveness to azithromycin. Evidence has also accumulated on the harms of test-and-treat strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Current practices vary widely, from widescale test-and-treat approaches to more individual patient- and partner-level case management. Choosing which asymptomatic people to test at what anatomic site, and whether to test or not, requires an urgent (re-)definition of the goals of testing and treating asymptomatic persons. Treatment guidelines are shifting toward universal doxycycline use, and clinical practice now faces the challenge of implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8922931/ /pubmed/35287617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M. Evers, Ymke J. Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. Wolffs, Petra F. G. de Vries, Henry J. C. Hoenderboom, Bernice van der Sande, Marianne A. B. Heijne, Janneke Klausner, Jeffrey D. Hocking, Jane S. van Bergen, Jan Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title | Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title_full | Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title_short | Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
title_sort | controversies and evidence on chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dukersmuijrersnicolehtm controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT eversymkej controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT hoebechristianjpa controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT wolffspetrafg controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT devrieshenryjc controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT hoenderboombernice controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT vandersandemarianneab controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT heijnejanneke controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT klausnerjeffreyd controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT hockingjanes controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview AT vanbergenjan controversiesandevidenceonchlamydiatestingandtreatmentinasymptomaticwomenandmenwhohavesexwithmenanarrativereview |