Cargando…
Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with a high risk of microvascular immunothrombosis as well as symptomatic and incidental thromboembolisms, predominantly in the venous system but also in the arterial system. This explains among other things th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00108-022-01296-x |
_version_ | 1784669604147101696 |
---|---|
author | Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula Riess, Hanno |
author_facet | Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula Riess, Hanno |
author_sort | Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with a high risk of microvascular immunothrombosis as well as symptomatic and incidental thromboembolisms, predominantly in the venous system but also in the arterial system. This explains among other things the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the patients. The present state of knowledge on the pathophysiology of immunothrombosis and the strategies of anticoagulation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are summarized and illuminated in this article. According to the current guidelines moderately to severely ill patients who are being treated in hospital should receive thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin or alternatively with fondaparinux, as long as there is no clearly increased risk of bleeding. Apart from the established indications for treatment, an intensified or therapeutic dose prophylaxis should be considered very cautiously in these critically ill patients, also due to the increased bleeding complications. The routine continuation of prophylactic anticoagulation after discharge from hospital is currently not recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8922984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89229842022-03-15 Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula Riess, Hanno Internist (Berl) Arzneimitteltherapie Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with a high risk of microvascular immunothrombosis as well as symptomatic and incidental thromboembolisms, predominantly in the venous system but also in the arterial system. This explains among other things the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the patients. The present state of knowledge on the pathophysiology of immunothrombosis and the strategies of anticoagulation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are summarized and illuminated in this article. According to the current guidelines moderately to severely ill patients who are being treated in hospital should receive thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin or alternatively with fondaparinux, as long as there is no clearly increased risk of bleeding. Apart from the established indications for treatment, an intensified or therapeutic dose prophylaxis should be considered very cautiously in these critically ill patients, also due to the increased bleeding complications. The routine continuation of prophylactic anticoagulation after discharge from hospital is currently not recommended. Springer Medizin 2022-03-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8922984/ /pubmed/35290499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00108-022-01296-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Arzneimitteltherapie Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula Riess, Hanno Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title | Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title_full | Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title_fullStr | Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title_full_unstemmed | Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title_short | Antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (COVID-19) – Gesichertes und Kontroverses |
title_sort | antikoagulation bei „coronavirus disease 2019“ (covid-19) – gesichertes und kontroverses |
topic | Arzneimitteltherapie |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00108-022-01296-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rauchkrohnertursula antikoagulationbeicoronavirusdisease2019covid19gesichertesundkontroverses AT riesshanno antikoagulationbeicoronavirusdisease2019covid19gesichertesundkontroverses |