Cargando…
A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious diseas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291299 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2 |
_version_ | 1784669628531736576 |
---|---|
author | Parhizkar, Hooman Fretz, Mark Laguerre, Aurélie Stenson, Jason Corsi, Richard L. Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G. Gall, Elliott T. |
author_facet | Parhizkar, Hooman Fretz, Mark Laguerre, Aurélie Stenson, Jason Corsi, Richard L. Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G. Gall, Elliott T. |
author_sort | Parhizkar, Hooman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious disease transmission and associated risks. In this study, we used an environmentally-controlled chamber to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from a healthy participant who consumed breath mints, which contained unique tracer compounds. Tracer measurements were made at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, 7.5 ft from the participant, as well as in the exhaust plenum of the chamber. We observed that 2.5 ft trials had substantially (~36–44%) higher concentrations than other distances during the first 20 minutes of experiments, highlighting the importance of the near-field relative to the far-field before virus-laden respiratory aerosol plumes are continuously mixed into the far-field. However, for the conditions studied, the concentrations of human-sourced tracers after 20 minutes and approaching the end of the 60-minute trials at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, and 7.5 ft were only ~18%, ~11%, and ~7.5% higher than volume-averaged concentrations, respectively. Our findings highlight the importance of far-field transmission of airborne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, which need to be considered in public health decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8923116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89231162022-03-16 A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields Parhizkar, Hooman Fretz, Mark Laguerre, Aurélie Stenson, Jason Corsi, Richard L. Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G. Gall, Elliott T. Res Sq Article Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious disease transmission and associated risks. In this study, we used an environmentally-controlled chamber to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from a healthy participant who consumed breath mints, which contained unique tracer compounds. Tracer measurements were made at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, 7.5 ft from the participant, as well as in the exhaust plenum of the chamber. We observed that 2.5 ft trials had substantially (~36–44%) higher concentrations than other distances during the first 20 minutes of experiments, highlighting the importance of the near-field relative to the far-field before virus-laden respiratory aerosol plumes are continuously mixed into the far-field. However, for the conditions studied, the concentrations of human-sourced tracers after 20 minutes and approaching the end of the 60-minute trials at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, and 7.5 ft were only ~18%, ~11%, and ~7.5% higher than volume-averaged concentrations, respectively. Our findings highlight the importance of far-field transmission of airborne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, which need to be considered in public health decision making. American Journal Experts 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8923116/ /pubmed/35291299 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Article Parhizkar, Hooman Fretz, Mark Laguerre, Aurélie Stenson, Jason Corsi, Richard L. Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G. Gall, Elliott T. A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title | A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title_full | A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title_fullStr | A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title_short | A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
title_sort | novel voc breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291299 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parhizkarhooman anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT fretzmark anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT laguerreaurelie anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT stensonjason anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT corsirichardl anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT vandenwymelenbergkeving anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT gallelliottt anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT parhizkarhooman novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT fretzmark novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT laguerreaurelie novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT stensonjason novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT corsirichardl novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT vandenwymelenbergkeving novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields AT gallelliottt novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields |