Cargando…

A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields

Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious diseas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parhizkar, Hooman, Fretz, Mark, Laguerre, Aurélie, Stenson, Jason, Corsi, Richard L., Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G., Gall, Elliott T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291299
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2
_version_ 1784669628531736576
author Parhizkar, Hooman
Fretz, Mark
Laguerre, Aurélie
Stenson, Jason
Corsi, Richard L.
Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G.
Gall, Elliott T.
author_facet Parhizkar, Hooman
Fretz, Mark
Laguerre, Aurélie
Stenson, Jason
Corsi, Richard L.
Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G.
Gall, Elliott T.
author_sort Parhizkar, Hooman
collection PubMed
description Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious disease transmission and associated risks. In this study, we used an environmentally-controlled chamber to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from a healthy participant who consumed breath mints, which contained unique tracer compounds. Tracer measurements were made at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, 7.5 ft from the participant, as well as in the exhaust plenum of the chamber. We observed that 2.5 ft trials had substantially (~36–44%) higher concentrations than other distances during the first 20 minutes of experiments, highlighting the importance of the near-field relative to the far-field before virus-laden respiratory aerosol plumes are continuously mixed into the far-field. However, for the conditions studied, the concentrations of human-sourced tracers after 20 minutes and approaching the end of the 60-minute trials at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, and 7.5 ft were only ~18%, ~11%, and ~7.5% higher than volume-averaged concentrations, respectively. Our findings highlight the importance of far-field transmission of airborne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, which need to be considered in public health decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8923116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89231162022-03-16 A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields Parhizkar, Hooman Fretz, Mark Laguerre, Aurélie Stenson, Jason Corsi, Richard L. Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G. Gall, Elliott T. Res Sq Article Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious disease transmission and associated risks. In this study, we used an environmentally-controlled chamber to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from a healthy participant who consumed breath mints, which contained unique tracer compounds. Tracer measurements were made at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, 7.5 ft from the participant, as well as in the exhaust plenum of the chamber. We observed that 2.5 ft trials had substantially (~36–44%) higher concentrations than other distances during the first 20 minutes of experiments, highlighting the importance of the near-field relative to the far-field before virus-laden respiratory aerosol plumes are continuously mixed into the far-field. However, for the conditions studied, the concentrations of human-sourced tracers after 20 minutes and approaching the end of the 60-minute trials at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, and 7.5 ft were only ~18%, ~11%, and ~7.5% higher than volume-averaged concentrations, respectively. Our findings highlight the importance of far-field transmission of airborne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, which need to be considered in public health decision making. American Journal Experts 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8923116/ /pubmed/35291299 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Parhizkar, Hooman
Fretz, Mark
Laguerre, Aurélie
Stenson, Jason
Corsi, Richard L.
Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin G.
Gall, Elliott T.
A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title_full A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title_fullStr A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title_full_unstemmed A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title_short A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
title_sort novel voc breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291299
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1437107/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT parhizkarhooman anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT fretzmark anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT laguerreaurelie anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT stensonjason anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT corsirichardl anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT vandenwymelenbergkeving anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT gallelliottt anovelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT parhizkarhooman novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT fretzmark novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT laguerreaurelie novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT stensonjason novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT corsirichardl novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT vandenwymelenbergkeving novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields
AT gallelliottt novelvocbreathtracermethodtoevaluateindoorrespiratoryexposuresinthenearandfarfields