Cargando…

Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks

BACKGROUND: Despite no proven benefit in clinical outcomes, perioperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rapidly adopted into breast cancer care in the 2000’s, offering a prime opportunity for assessing factors influencing overutilization of unproven technology. OBJECTIVES: To examine variatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiao, Soulos, Pamela R., Herrin, Jeph, Wang, Shi-Yi, Pollack, Craig Evan, Killelea, Brigid K., Forman, Howard P., Gross, Cary P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265188
_version_ 1784669672563539968
author Xu, Xiao
Soulos, Pamela R.
Herrin, Jeph
Wang, Shi-Yi
Pollack, Craig Evan
Killelea, Brigid K.
Forman, Howard P.
Gross, Cary P.
author_facet Xu, Xiao
Soulos, Pamela R.
Herrin, Jeph
Wang, Shi-Yi
Pollack, Craig Evan
Killelea, Brigid K.
Forman, Howard P.
Gross, Cary P.
author_sort Xu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite no proven benefit in clinical outcomes, perioperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rapidly adopted into breast cancer care in the 2000’s, offering a prime opportunity for assessing factors influencing overutilization of unproven technology. OBJECTIVES: To examine variation among physician patient-sharing networks in their trajectory of adopting perioperative MRI for breast cancer surgery and compare the characteristics of patients, providers, and mastectomy use in physician networks that had different adoption trajectories. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database in 2004–2009, we identified 147 physician patient-sharing networks (caring for 26,886 patients with stage I-III breast cancer). After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, we calculated risk-adjusted rate of perioperative MRI use for each physician network in 2004–2005, 2006–2007, and 2008–2009, respectively. Based on the risk-adjusted rate, we identified three distinct trajectories of adopting perioperative MRI among physician networks: 1) low adoption (risk-adjusted rate of perioperative MRI increased from 2.8% in 2004–2005 to 14.8% in 2008–2009), 2) medium adoption (8.8% to 45.1%), and 3) high adoption (33.0% to 71.7%). Physician networks in the higher adoption trajectory tended to have a larger proportion of cancer specialists, more patients with high income, and fewer patients who were Black. After adjusting for patients’ clinical risk factors, the proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy decreased from 41.1% in 2004–2005 to 38.5% in 2008–2009 among those in physician networks with low MRI adoption, but increased from 27.0% to 31.4% among those in physician networks with high MRI adoption (p = 0.03 for the interaction term between trajectory group and time). CONCLUSIONS: Physician patient-sharing networks varied in their trajectory of adopting perioperative MRI. These distinct trajectories were associated with the composition of patients and providers in the networks, and had important implications for patterns of mastectomy use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8923453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89234532022-03-16 Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks Xu, Xiao Soulos, Pamela R. Herrin, Jeph Wang, Shi-Yi Pollack, Craig Evan Killelea, Brigid K. Forman, Howard P. Gross, Cary P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite no proven benefit in clinical outcomes, perioperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rapidly adopted into breast cancer care in the 2000’s, offering a prime opportunity for assessing factors influencing overutilization of unproven technology. OBJECTIVES: To examine variation among physician patient-sharing networks in their trajectory of adopting perioperative MRI for breast cancer surgery and compare the characteristics of patients, providers, and mastectomy use in physician networks that had different adoption trajectories. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database in 2004–2009, we identified 147 physician patient-sharing networks (caring for 26,886 patients with stage I-III breast cancer). After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, we calculated risk-adjusted rate of perioperative MRI use for each physician network in 2004–2005, 2006–2007, and 2008–2009, respectively. Based on the risk-adjusted rate, we identified three distinct trajectories of adopting perioperative MRI among physician networks: 1) low adoption (risk-adjusted rate of perioperative MRI increased from 2.8% in 2004–2005 to 14.8% in 2008–2009), 2) medium adoption (8.8% to 45.1%), and 3) high adoption (33.0% to 71.7%). Physician networks in the higher adoption trajectory tended to have a larger proportion of cancer specialists, more patients with high income, and fewer patients who were Black. After adjusting for patients’ clinical risk factors, the proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy decreased from 41.1% in 2004–2005 to 38.5% in 2008–2009 among those in physician networks with low MRI adoption, but increased from 27.0% to 31.4% among those in physician networks with high MRI adoption (p = 0.03 for the interaction term between trajectory group and time). CONCLUSIONS: Physician patient-sharing networks varied in their trajectory of adopting perioperative MRI. These distinct trajectories were associated with the composition of patients and providers in the networks, and had important implications for patterns of mastectomy use. Public Library of Science 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8923453/ /pubmed/35290417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265188 Text en © 2022 Xu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Xiao
Soulos, Pamela R.
Herrin, Jeph
Wang, Shi-Yi
Pollack, Craig Evan
Killelea, Brigid K.
Forman, Howard P.
Gross, Cary P.
Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title_full Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title_fullStr Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title_short Perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: Distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
title_sort perioperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer care: distinct adoption trajectories among physician patient-sharing networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265188
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiao perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT soulospamelar perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT herrinjeph perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT wangshiyi perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT pollackcraigevan perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT killeleabrigidk perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT formanhowardp perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks
AT grosscaryp perioperativemagneticresonanceimaginginbreastcancercaredistinctadoptiontrajectoriesamongphysicianpatientsharingnetworks