Cargando…
Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab
Avelumab (anti–PD‐L1) is an approved anticancer treatment for several indications. The JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior overall survival (OS) with avelumab maintenance versus continued chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34971492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12754 |
_version_ | 1784669721748045824 |
---|---|
author | Terranova, Nadia French, Jonathan Dai, Haiqing Wiens, Matthew Khandelwal, Akash Ruiz‐Garcia, Ana Manitz, Juliane von Heydebreck, Anja Ruisi, Mary Chin, Kevin Girard, Pascal Venkatakrishnan, Karthik |
author_facet | Terranova, Nadia French, Jonathan Dai, Haiqing Wiens, Matthew Khandelwal, Akash Ruiz‐Garcia, Ana Manitz, Juliane von Heydebreck, Anja Ruisi, Mary Chin, Kevin Girard, Pascal Venkatakrishnan, Karthik |
author_sort | Terranova, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Avelumab (anti–PD‐L1) is an approved anticancer treatment for several indications. The JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior overall survival (OS) with avelumab maintenance versus continued chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer; however, the OS rate was numerically higher with avelumab at timepoints after 12 months. Machine learning (random forests, SIDEScreen, and variable‐importance assessments) was used to build models to identify prognostic/predictive factors associated with long‐term OS and tumor growth dynamics (TGDs). Baseline, re‐baseline, and longitudinal variables were evaluated as covariates in a parametric time‐to‐event model for OS and Gompertzian population model for TGD. The final OS model incorporated a treatment effect on the log‐logistic shape parameter but did not identify a treatment effect on OS or TGD. Variables identified as prognostic for longer OS included older age; higher gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) or albumin; absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis; lower neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, or C‐reactive protein (CRP); response to induction chemotherapy; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. Among baseline and time‐varying covariates, the largest effects were found for GGT and CRP, respectively. Liver metastasis at re‐baseline predicted higher tumor growth. Tumor size after induction chemotherapy was associated with number of metastatic sites and stable disease (vs. response). Asian region did not impact OS or TGD. Overall, an innovative workflow supporting pharmacometric modeling of OS and TGD was established. Consistent with the primary trial analysis, no treatment effect was identified. However, potential prognostic factors were identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8923733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89237332022-03-21 Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab Terranova, Nadia French, Jonathan Dai, Haiqing Wiens, Matthew Khandelwal, Akash Ruiz‐Garcia, Ana Manitz, Juliane von Heydebreck, Anja Ruisi, Mary Chin, Kevin Girard, Pascal Venkatakrishnan, Karthik CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Avelumab (anti–PD‐L1) is an approved anticancer treatment for several indications. The JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior overall survival (OS) with avelumab maintenance versus continued chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer; however, the OS rate was numerically higher with avelumab at timepoints after 12 months. Machine learning (random forests, SIDEScreen, and variable‐importance assessments) was used to build models to identify prognostic/predictive factors associated with long‐term OS and tumor growth dynamics (TGDs). Baseline, re‐baseline, and longitudinal variables were evaluated as covariates in a parametric time‐to‐event model for OS and Gompertzian population model for TGD. The final OS model incorporated a treatment effect on the log‐logistic shape parameter but did not identify a treatment effect on OS or TGD. Variables identified as prognostic for longer OS included older age; higher gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) or albumin; absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis; lower neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, or C‐reactive protein (CRP); response to induction chemotherapy; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. Among baseline and time‐varying covariates, the largest effects were found for GGT and CRP, respectively. Liver metastasis at re‐baseline predicted higher tumor growth. Tumor size after induction chemotherapy was associated with number of metastatic sites and stable disease (vs. response). Asian region did not impact OS or TGD. Overall, an innovative workflow supporting pharmacometric modeling of OS and TGD was established. Consistent with the primary trial analysis, no treatment effect was identified. However, potential prognostic factors were identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-19 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8923733/ /pubmed/34971492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12754 Text en © 2021 The healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and Metrum Research Group. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Terranova, Nadia French, Jonathan Dai, Haiqing Wiens, Matthew Khandelwal, Akash Ruiz‐Garcia, Ana Manitz, Juliane von Heydebreck, Anja Ruisi, Mary Chin, Kevin Girard, Pascal Venkatakrishnan, Karthik Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title | Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title_full | Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title_fullStr | Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title_short | Pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase III trial of avelumab |
title_sort | pharmacometric modeling and machine learning analyses of prognostic and predictive factors in the javelin gastric 100 phase iii trial of avelumab |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34971492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terranovanadia pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT frenchjonathan pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT daihaiqing pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT wiensmatthew pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT khandelwalakash pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT ruizgarciaana pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT manitzjuliane pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT vonheydebreckanja pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT ruisimary pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT chinkevin pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT girardpascal pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab AT venkatakrishnankarthik pharmacometricmodelingandmachinelearninganalysesofprognosticandpredictivefactorsinthejavelingastric100phaseiiitrialofavelumab |