Cargando…

Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review

PURPOSES: Healthcare workers are at risk of stress-related disorders. Risk communication can be an effective preventive health measure for some health risks, but is not yet common in the prevention of stress-related disorders in an occupational healthcare setting. The overall aim is to examine wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emal, Lima M., Tamminga, Sietske J., Daams, Joost G., Kezic, Sanja, Timmermans, Danielle R. M., Schaafsma, Frederieke G., van der Molen, Henk F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSES: Healthcare workers are at risk of stress-related disorders. Risk communication can be an effective preventive health measure for some health risks, but is not yet common in the prevention of stress-related disorders in an occupational healthcare setting. The overall aim is to examine whether risk communication was part of interventions aimed at the prevention of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers. METHOD: We performed a scoping review using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. We searched in Medline, Web of Science and PsychInfo for studies reporting on preventive interventions of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers between 2005 and December 2020. Studies were included when the intervention reported on at least one element of risk communication and one goal. We predefined four elements of risk communication: risk perception, communication of early stress symptoms, risk factors and prevention; and three goals: inform, stimulate informed decision-making and motivate action. RESULTS: We included 23 studies that described 17 interventions. None of the included interventions were primarily developed as risk communication interventions, but all addressed the goals. Two interventions used all four elements of risk communication. The prominent mode of delivery was face to face, mostly delivered by researchers. Early stress symptoms and risk factors were measured by surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Risk communication on risk factors and early signs of stress-related disorders is not that well studied and evaluated in an occupational healthcare setting. Overall, the content of the communication was not based on the risk perception of the healthcare workers, which limited the likelihood of them taking action. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x.