Cargando…

Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review

PURPOSES: Healthcare workers are at risk of stress-related disorders. Risk communication can be an effective preventive health measure for some health risks, but is not yet common in the prevention of stress-related disorders in an occupational healthcare setting. The overall aim is to examine wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emal, Lima M., Tamminga, Sietske J., Daams, Joost G., Kezic, Sanja, Timmermans, Danielle R. M., Schaafsma, Frederieke G., van der Molen, Henk F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x
_version_ 1784669744287186944
author Emal, Lima M.
Tamminga, Sietske J.
Daams, Joost G.
Kezic, Sanja
Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van der Molen, Henk F.
author_facet Emal, Lima M.
Tamminga, Sietske J.
Daams, Joost G.
Kezic, Sanja
Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van der Molen, Henk F.
author_sort Emal, Lima M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSES: Healthcare workers are at risk of stress-related disorders. Risk communication can be an effective preventive health measure for some health risks, but is not yet common in the prevention of stress-related disorders in an occupational healthcare setting. The overall aim is to examine whether risk communication was part of interventions aimed at the prevention of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers. METHOD: We performed a scoping review using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. We searched in Medline, Web of Science and PsychInfo for studies reporting on preventive interventions of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers between 2005 and December 2020. Studies were included when the intervention reported on at least one element of risk communication and one goal. We predefined four elements of risk communication: risk perception, communication of early stress symptoms, risk factors and prevention; and three goals: inform, stimulate informed decision-making and motivate action. RESULTS: We included 23 studies that described 17 interventions. None of the included interventions were primarily developed as risk communication interventions, but all addressed the goals. Two interventions used all four elements of risk communication. The prominent mode of delivery was face to face, mostly delivered by researchers. Early stress symptoms and risk factors were measured by surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Risk communication on risk factors and early signs of stress-related disorders is not that well studied and evaluated in an occupational healthcare setting. Overall, the content of the communication was not based on the risk perception of the healthcare workers, which limited the likelihood of them taking action. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8923828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89238282022-03-16 Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review Emal, Lima M. Tamminga, Sietske J. Daams, Joost G. Kezic, Sanja Timmermans, Danielle R. M. Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van der Molen, Henk F. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article PURPOSES: Healthcare workers are at risk of stress-related disorders. Risk communication can be an effective preventive health measure for some health risks, but is not yet common in the prevention of stress-related disorders in an occupational healthcare setting. The overall aim is to examine whether risk communication was part of interventions aimed at the prevention of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers. METHOD: We performed a scoping review using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. We searched in Medline, Web of Science and PsychInfo for studies reporting on preventive interventions of stress-related disorders in healthcare workers between 2005 and December 2020. Studies were included when the intervention reported on at least one element of risk communication and one goal. We predefined four elements of risk communication: risk perception, communication of early stress symptoms, risk factors and prevention; and three goals: inform, stimulate informed decision-making and motivate action. RESULTS: We included 23 studies that described 17 interventions. None of the included interventions were primarily developed as risk communication interventions, but all addressed the goals. Two interventions used all four elements of risk communication. The prominent mode of delivery was face to face, mostly delivered by researchers. Early stress symptoms and risk factors were measured by surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Risk communication on risk factors and early signs of stress-related disorders is not that well studied and evaluated in an occupational healthcare setting. Overall, the content of the communication was not based on the risk perception of the healthcare workers, which limited the likelihood of them taking action. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8923828/ /pubmed/35292839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Emal, Lima M.
Tamminga, Sietske J.
Daams, Joost G.
Kezic, Sanja
Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van der Molen, Henk F.
Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title_full Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title_fullStr Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title_short Risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
title_sort risk communication about work-related stress disorders in healthcare workers: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01851-x
work_keys_str_mv AT emallimam riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT tammingasietskej riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT daamsjoostg riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT kezicsanja riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT timmermansdaniellerm riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT schaafsmafrederiekeg riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview
AT vandermolenhenkf riskcommunicationaboutworkrelatedstressdisordersinhealthcareworkersascopingreview