Cargando…

Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. METHODS: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakely, Hannah, Radakovic, Ratko, Bateman, Andrew, Simblett, Sara, Fish, Jessica, Gracey, Fergus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
_version_ 1784669763874586624
author Wakely, Hannah
Radakovic, Ratko
Bateman, Andrew
Simblett, Sara
Fish, Jessica
Gracey, Fergus
author_facet Wakely, Hannah
Radakovic, Ratko
Bateman, Andrew
Simblett, Sara
Fish, Jessica
Gracey, Fergus
author_sort Wakely, Hannah
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. METHODS: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also completed the FrSBe, with 99 additionally completing the DEX-R again 3 weeks later. Correlations with demographic factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression were conducted. Rasch and factor analysis were also used to explore underlying subconstructs. RESULTS: The DEX-R correlated highly with the FrSBe, indicating sound concurrent validity. Internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were excellent. Age and symptoms of depression and anxiety correlated with DEX-R scores, with older age associated with less dysexecutive problems. The Rasch analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the rating scale, and a three-factor structure was found relating to activation-self-regulatory, cognitive and social-emotional processes. Frequencies of responses on DEX-R items varied, many were not fully endorsed indicating specific relevance of most but not all items to patients. CONCLUSION: Interpretations of DEX-R ratings of dysexecutive problems should consider mood and individual variation. Systematic comparison of DEX-R responses between healthy and clinical groups could help identify a suitable cut off for dysexecutive symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8924056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89240562022-03-17 Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population Wakely, Hannah Radakovic, Ratko Bateman, Andrew Simblett, Sara Fish, Jessica Gracey, Fergus Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. METHODS: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also completed the FrSBe, with 99 additionally completing the DEX-R again 3 weeks later. Correlations with demographic factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression were conducted. Rasch and factor analysis were also used to explore underlying subconstructs. RESULTS: The DEX-R correlated highly with the FrSBe, indicating sound concurrent validity. Internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were excellent. Age and symptoms of depression and anxiety correlated with DEX-R scores, with older age associated with less dysexecutive problems. The Rasch analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the rating scale, and a three-factor structure was found relating to activation-self-regulatory, cognitive and social-emotional processes. Frequencies of responses on DEX-R items varied, many were not fully endorsed indicating specific relevance of most but not all items to patients. CONCLUSION: Interpretations of DEX-R ratings of dysexecutive problems should consider mood and individual variation. Systematic comparison of DEX-R responses between healthy and clinical groups could help identify a suitable cut off for dysexecutive symptoms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8924056/ /pubmed/35308604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wakely, Radakovic, Bateman, Simblett, Fish and Gracey. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wakely, Hannah
Radakovic, Ratko
Bateman, Andrew
Simblett, Sara
Fish, Jessica
Gracey, Fergus
Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title_full Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title_short Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population
title_sort psychometric properties of the revised dysexecutive questionnaire in a non-clinical population
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
work_keys_str_mv AT wakelyhannah psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation
AT radakovicratko psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation
AT batemanandrew psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation
AT simblettsara psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation
AT fishjessica psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation
AT graceyfergus psychometricpropertiesofthereviseddysexecutivequestionnaireinanonclinicalpopulation