Cargando…

Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles

Fluid intake is important to prevent dehydration and reduce recurrent kidney stones. There has been a trend in recent years to develop tools to monitor fluid intake using “smart” products such as smart bottles. Several commercial smart bottles are available, mainly targeting health-conscious adults....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Rachel, Fernie, Geoff, Roshan Fekr, Atena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08335-5
_version_ 1784669794844278784
author Cohen, Rachel
Fernie, Geoff
Roshan Fekr, Atena
author_facet Cohen, Rachel
Fernie, Geoff
Roshan Fekr, Atena
author_sort Cohen, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Fluid intake is important to prevent dehydration and reduce recurrent kidney stones. There has been a trend in recent years to develop tools to monitor fluid intake using “smart” products such as smart bottles. Several commercial smart bottles are available, mainly targeting health-conscious adults. To the best of our knowledge, these bottles have not been validated in the literature. This study compares four commercially available smart bottles in terms of both performance and functionality. These bottles are the H2OPal, HidrateSpark Steel, HidrateSpark 3, and Thermos Smart Lid. One hundred intake events for each bottle were recorded and analyzed versus ground truth obtained from a high-resolution weight scale. The H2OPal had the lowest Mean Percent Error (MPE) and was able to balance out errors throughout multiple sips. The HidrateSpark 3 provided the most consistent and reliable results, with the lowest per sip error. The MPE values for HidrateSpark bottles were further improved using linear regression, as they had more consistent individual error values. The Thermos Smart Lid provides the lowest accuracy, as the sensors do not extend through the entire bottle, leading to many missed recordings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8924188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89241882022-03-17 Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles Cohen, Rachel Fernie, Geoff Roshan Fekr, Atena Sci Rep Article Fluid intake is important to prevent dehydration and reduce recurrent kidney stones. There has been a trend in recent years to develop tools to monitor fluid intake using “smart” products such as smart bottles. Several commercial smart bottles are available, mainly targeting health-conscious adults. To the best of our knowledge, these bottles have not been validated in the literature. This study compares four commercially available smart bottles in terms of both performance and functionality. These bottles are the H2OPal, HidrateSpark Steel, HidrateSpark 3, and Thermos Smart Lid. One hundred intake events for each bottle were recorded and analyzed versus ground truth obtained from a high-resolution weight scale. The H2OPal had the lowest Mean Percent Error (MPE) and was able to balance out errors throughout multiple sips. The HidrateSpark 3 provided the most consistent and reliable results, with the lowest per sip error. The MPE values for HidrateSpark bottles were further improved using linear regression, as they had more consistent individual error values. The Thermos Smart Lid provides the lowest accuracy, as the sensors do not extend through the entire bottle, leading to many missed recordings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8924188/ /pubmed/35292675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08335-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cohen, Rachel
Fernie, Geoff
Roshan Fekr, Atena
Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title_full Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title_fullStr Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title_short Monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
title_sort monitoring fluid intake by commercially available smart water bottles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08335-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenrachel monitoringfluidintakebycommerciallyavailablesmartwaterbottles
AT ferniegeoff monitoringfluidintakebycommerciallyavailablesmartwaterbottles
AT roshanfekratena monitoringfluidintakebycommerciallyavailablesmartwaterbottles