Cargando…

Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model

INTRODUCTION: Transorbital sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is an emerging non-invasive technique for the identification and monitoring of intracranial hypertension. In recent years, new pocket ultrasound devices have become available, and it is uncertain if they have th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Garrett G. R. J., Jelic, Tomislav, Derksen, Angela, Unger, Bertram, Zeiler, Frederick A., Ziesmann, Markus T., Gillman, Lawrence M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.831778
_version_ 1784669849372327936
author Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Jelic, Tomislav
Derksen, Angela
Unger, Bertram
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Ziesmann, Markus T.
Gillman, Lawrence M.
author_facet Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Jelic, Tomislav
Derksen, Angela
Unger, Bertram
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Ziesmann, Markus T.
Gillman, Lawrence M.
author_sort Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transorbital sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is an emerging non-invasive technique for the identification and monitoring of intracranial hypertension. In recent years, new pocket ultrasound devices have become available, and it is uncertain if they have the resolution to measure such small structures appropriately as compared to their predecessors. In this study, we measure the performance of three ultrasound units on a simulation model to establish their precision and accuracy. METHODS: ONSD was measured by three expert point-of-care sonographers using ultrasound machines three times on each of seven discrete ONS model sizes ranging from 3.5 to 7.9 mm. Two pocket ultrasounds (IVIZ, Sonosite, and Lumify, Philips) and one standard-sized portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, Sonosite) were used. Measurements were analyzed for mean error and variance and tested for significance using blocked covariance matrix regression analyses. RESULTS: The devices differed in their variances (Lumify: 0.19 mm(2), M-Turbo: 0.26 mm(2), IVIZ: 0.34 mm(2)) and their mean error (Lumify: −0.05 mm, M-Turbo: 0.10 mm, IVIZ: −0.10 mm). The difference in mean error between users is not significant (p = 0.45), but there is a significant difference in mean error between devices (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement is possible utilizing pocket-sized ultrasound, and in some cases, may be more accurate than larger portable ultrasound units. While the differences in these devices were statistically significant, all three were highly accurate, with one pocket device (Lumify) outperforming the rest. Further study in human subjects should be conducted prior to using pocket ultrasound devices for in vivo diagnosis of intracranial hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8924410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89244102022-03-17 Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Jelic, Tomislav Derksen, Angela Unger, Bertram Zeiler, Frederick A. Ziesmann, Markus T. Gillman, Lawrence M. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Transorbital sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is an emerging non-invasive technique for the identification and monitoring of intracranial hypertension. In recent years, new pocket ultrasound devices have become available, and it is uncertain if they have the resolution to measure such small structures appropriately as compared to their predecessors. In this study, we measure the performance of three ultrasound units on a simulation model to establish their precision and accuracy. METHODS: ONSD was measured by three expert point-of-care sonographers using ultrasound machines three times on each of seven discrete ONS model sizes ranging from 3.5 to 7.9 mm. Two pocket ultrasounds (IVIZ, Sonosite, and Lumify, Philips) and one standard-sized portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, Sonosite) were used. Measurements were analyzed for mean error and variance and tested for significance using blocked covariance matrix regression analyses. RESULTS: The devices differed in their variances (Lumify: 0.19 mm(2), M-Turbo: 0.26 mm(2), IVIZ: 0.34 mm(2)) and their mean error (Lumify: −0.05 mm, M-Turbo: 0.10 mm, IVIZ: −0.10 mm). The difference in mean error between users is not significant (p = 0.45), but there is a significant difference in mean error between devices (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement is possible utilizing pocket-sized ultrasound, and in some cases, may be more accurate than larger portable ultrasound units. While the differences in these devices were statistically significant, all three were highly accurate, with one pocket device (Lumify) outperforming the rest. Further study in human subjects should be conducted prior to using pocket ultrasound devices for in vivo diagnosis of intracranial hypertension. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8924410/ /pubmed/35308521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.831778 Text en Copyright © 2022 Johnson, Jelic, Derksen, Unger, Zeiler, Ziesmann and Gillman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Jelic, Tomislav
Derksen, Angela
Unger, Bertram
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Ziesmann, Markus T.
Gillman, Lawrence M.
Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title_full Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title_fullStr Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title_short Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurements in Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Devices in a Simulation Model
title_sort accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurements in pocket-sized ultrasound devices in a simulation model
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.831778
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsongarrettgrj accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT jelictomislav accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT derksenangela accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT ungerbertram accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT zeilerfredericka accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT ziesmannmarkust accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel
AT gillmanlawrencem accuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementsinpocketsizedultrasounddevicesinasimulationmodel