Cargando…
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Eating or skipping breakfast for weight interests scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal effects of eating versus skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes in humans. Methods: Six databases were searched for...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340783 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22424.3 |
_version_ | 1784669883869429760 |
---|---|
author | Bohan Brown, Michelle M. Milanes, Jillian E. Allison, David B. Brown, Andrew W. |
author_facet | Bohan Brown, Michelle M. Milanes, Jillian E. Allison, David B. Brown, Andrew W. |
author_sort | Bohan Brown, Michelle M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Eating or skipping breakfast for weight interests scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal effects of eating versus skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes in humans. Methods: Six databases were searched for obesity- and breakfast-related terms (final search: 02 JAN 2020). Studies needed to isolate eating versus skipping breakfast in randomized controlled trials. Mean differences were synthesized using inverse variance random effects meta-analysis for each outcome. Positive estimates indicate higher outcomes in breakfast conditions (e.g., weight gain). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, secondary baseline habit-by-breakfast assignment analysis, and study duration cumulative analysis were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Ten articles (12 comparisons; 6d-12wk) were included. Conditions included recommendations to eat versus skip breakfast, or provision of some or all meals. 95% confidence intervals of all main analyses included the null value of no difference for each outcome: body weight (0.17 kg [-0.40,0.73], k=12, n=487, I (2)=74.5), BMI (0.07 kg/m (2) [-0.10,0.23, k=8, n=396, I (2)=54.1), body fat percentage (-0.27% [-1.01,0.47], k=6, n=179, I (2)=52.4), fat mass (0.24 kg [-0.21,0.69], k=6, n=205, I (2)=0.0), lean mass (0.18 kg [-0.08,0.44], k=6, n=205, I (2)=6.7), waist circumference (0.18 cm [-1.77,2.13], k=4, n=102, I (2)=78.7), waist:hip ratio (0.00 [-0.01,0.01], k=4, n=102, I (2)=8.0), sagittal abdominal diameter (0.19 cm [-2.35,2.73], k=2, n=56, I (2)=0.0), and fat mass index (0.00 kg/m (2 )[-0.22,0.23], k=2, n=56, I (2)=0.0). Subgroup analysis showed only one statistically significant result. The interaction effect for BMI (–0.36[-0.65,-0.07]) indicates assignment to conditions consistent with baseline habits had lower BMI. Leave-one-out analysis did not indicate substantial influence of any one study. Conclusions: There was no discernible effect of eating or skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric measures when pooling studies with substantial design heterogeneity and sometimes statistical heterogeneity. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016033290. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8924556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89245562022-03-24 Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bohan Brown, Michelle M. Milanes, Jillian E. Allison, David B. Brown, Andrew W. F1000Res Research Article Background: Eating or skipping breakfast for weight interests scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal effects of eating versus skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes in humans. Methods: Six databases were searched for obesity- and breakfast-related terms (final search: 02 JAN 2020). Studies needed to isolate eating versus skipping breakfast in randomized controlled trials. Mean differences were synthesized using inverse variance random effects meta-analysis for each outcome. Positive estimates indicate higher outcomes in breakfast conditions (e.g., weight gain). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, secondary baseline habit-by-breakfast assignment analysis, and study duration cumulative analysis were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Ten articles (12 comparisons; 6d-12wk) were included. Conditions included recommendations to eat versus skip breakfast, or provision of some or all meals. 95% confidence intervals of all main analyses included the null value of no difference for each outcome: body weight (0.17 kg [-0.40,0.73], k=12, n=487, I (2)=74.5), BMI (0.07 kg/m (2) [-0.10,0.23, k=8, n=396, I (2)=54.1), body fat percentage (-0.27% [-1.01,0.47], k=6, n=179, I (2)=52.4), fat mass (0.24 kg [-0.21,0.69], k=6, n=205, I (2)=0.0), lean mass (0.18 kg [-0.08,0.44], k=6, n=205, I (2)=6.7), waist circumference (0.18 cm [-1.77,2.13], k=4, n=102, I (2)=78.7), waist:hip ratio (0.00 [-0.01,0.01], k=4, n=102, I (2)=8.0), sagittal abdominal diameter (0.19 cm [-2.35,2.73], k=2, n=56, I (2)=0.0), and fat mass index (0.00 kg/m (2 )[-0.22,0.23], k=2, n=56, I (2)=0.0). Subgroup analysis showed only one statistically significant result. The interaction effect for BMI (–0.36[-0.65,-0.07]) indicates assignment to conditions consistent with baseline habits had lower BMI. Leave-one-out analysis did not indicate substantial influence of any one study. Conclusions: There was no discernible effect of eating or skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric measures when pooling studies with substantial design heterogeneity and sometimes statistical heterogeneity. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016033290. F1000 Research Limited 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8924556/ /pubmed/35340783 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22424.3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Bohan Brown MM et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bohan Brown, Michelle M. Milanes, Jillian E. Allison, David B. Brown, Andrew W. Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340783 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22424.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohanbrownmichellem eatingversusskippingbreakfasthasnodiscernibleeffectonobesityrelatedanthropometricoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT milanesjilliane eatingversusskippingbreakfasthasnodiscernibleeffectonobesityrelatedanthropometricoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT allisondavidb eatingversusskippingbreakfasthasnodiscernibleeffectonobesityrelatedanthropometricoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brownandreww eatingversusskippingbreakfasthasnodiscernibleeffectonobesityrelatedanthropometricoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |