Cargando…

Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods

Starting from the late 1950s, mainly as a reaction to Leontief’s paradoxical results, a large amount of research has underlined the great importance of technology and human capital in explaining international trade in manufactures. This study examines the patterns of comparative advantages for 42 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Algieri, Bernardina, Aquino, Antonio, Succurro, Marianna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924731/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40797-022-00185-4
_version_ 1784669921963147264
author Algieri, Bernardina
Aquino, Antonio
Succurro, Marianna
author_facet Algieri, Bernardina
Aquino, Antonio
Succurro, Marianna
author_sort Algieri, Bernardina
collection PubMed
description Starting from the late 1950s, mainly as a reaction to Leontief’s paradoxical results, a large amount of research has underlined the great importance of technology and human capital in explaining international trade in manufactures. This study examines the patterns of comparative advantages for 42 countries and 91 manufactured classes of final and intermediate products and their changes between 2001 and 2019. The dynamics and the effects of the international fragmentation of production processes are also considered. Comparative advantages in each class of products are related to three different measures of a country’s human capital or technology endowment: the cost of labour, the level of formal education and the number of patents per capita. An indicator of home market size enters the model as a control variable. The econometric analysis reveals that in 2019, human capital or technology endowments explain comparative advantages in 70 out of 91 products. In particular, 31 products are positively and significantly associated with at least 1 of the 3 human capital or technology indicators, 34 products are negatively and significantly linked to at least 1 indicator, 5 products show contrasting results, 21 products are not related to any human capital or technology indicator. Between 2001 and 2019, comparative advantages for 15 classes of products shifted towards lower-technology countries and for 18 productions towards higher-technology countries. There were no shifts for 51 products. From a policy perspective, the distinction between high and low-technology productions could have some interesting implications. Since high-technology productions are characterised by a higher learning-by-doing rate, governments should foster domestic firms to upgrade the human capital or technology intensity of their productions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40797-022-00185-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8924731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89247312022-03-16 Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods Algieri, Bernardina Aquino, Antonio Succurro, Marianna Ital Econ J Research Paper Starting from the late 1950s, mainly as a reaction to Leontief’s paradoxical results, a large amount of research has underlined the great importance of technology and human capital in explaining international trade in manufactures. This study examines the patterns of comparative advantages for 42 countries and 91 manufactured classes of final and intermediate products and their changes between 2001 and 2019. The dynamics and the effects of the international fragmentation of production processes are also considered. Comparative advantages in each class of products are related to three different measures of a country’s human capital or technology endowment: the cost of labour, the level of formal education and the number of patents per capita. An indicator of home market size enters the model as a control variable. The econometric analysis reveals that in 2019, human capital or technology endowments explain comparative advantages in 70 out of 91 products. In particular, 31 products are positively and significantly associated with at least 1 of the 3 human capital or technology indicators, 34 products are negatively and significantly linked to at least 1 indicator, 5 products show contrasting results, 21 products are not related to any human capital or technology indicator. Between 2001 and 2019, comparative advantages for 15 classes of products shifted towards lower-technology countries and for 18 productions towards higher-technology countries. There were no shifts for 51 products. From a policy perspective, the distinction between high and low-technology productions could have some interesting implications. Since high-technology productions are characterised by a higher learning-by-doing rate, governments should foster domestic firms to upgrade the human capital or technology intensity of their productions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40797-022-00185-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8924731/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40797-022-00185-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
Algieri, Bernardina
Aquino, Antonio
Succurro, Marianna
Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title_full Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title_fullStr Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title_full_unstemmed Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title_short Trade Specialisation and Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantages in Manufactured Goods
title_sort trade specialisation and changing patterns of comparative advantages in manufactured goods
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924731/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40797-022-00185-4
work_keys_str_mv AT algieribernardina tradespecialisationandchangingpatternsofcomparativeadvantagesinmanufacturedgoods
AT aquinoantonio tradespecialisationandchangingpatternsofcomparativeadvantagesinmanufacturedgoods
AT succurromarianna tradespecialisationandchangingpatternsofcomparativeadvantagesinmanufacturedgoods