Cargando…
Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to describe the prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adult heart-transplant (HT) patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The study protocol was registe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00431-4 |
_version_ | 1784669923577954304 |
---|---|
author | Villa, Bernardo Perez Alotaibi, Sultan Brozzi, Nicolas Spindler, Kurt P. Navia, Jose Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime |
author_facet | Villa, Bernardo Perez Alotaibi, Sultan Brozzi, Nicolas Spindler, Kurt P. Navia, Jose Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime |
author_sort | Villa, Bernardo Perez |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to describe the prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adult heart-transplant (HT) patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The study protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42021225398), and the last search was performed on January 7, 2021. We included studies of adult HT patients where generic and disease-specific PROMs were used as prognostic indicators for survival, readmissions, HT complications, and the onset of new comorbidities. We excluded studies that used clinician-reported and patient-experience outcomes. The Quality in Prognosis Studies tool (QUIPS) was used to measure the risk of bias of the included studies. RESULTS: We included five observational studies between 1987 and 2015, whose populations’ mean age ranged from 43 to 56 years and presented a higher proportion of males than females. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire demonstrated a negative correlation with readmissions (coefficient = − 1.177, p = 0.031), and the EQ-5D showed a negative correlation with the onset of neuromuscular disease after HT (coefficient = − 0.158, p < 0.001). The Millon Behavioral Health Inventory and the Nottingham Health Profile demonstrated a statistically significant association as survival predictors (p = 0.002 and p < 0.05, respectively). A moderate overall risk of bias was reported in three studies, one study resulted in a low risk of bias, and a proportion of more than 75% of males in each of the studies. High heterogeneity between the studies impeded establishing a link between PROMs and prognostic value. CONCLUSION: There is low evidence supporting PROMs usage as prognostic tools in adult HT patients. Comparing outcomes of PROMS to routine prognostic in wider and systematic settings is warranted. Systematic use of PROMs in clinical settings is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00431-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8924738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89247382022-03-16 Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review Villa, Bernardo Perez Alotaibi, Sultan Brozzi, Nicolas Spindler, Kurt P. Navia, Jose Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to describe the prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adult heart-transplant (HT) patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on Ovid Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The study protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42021225398), and the last search was performed on January 7, 2021. We included studies of adult HT patients where generic and disease-specific PROMs were used as prognostic indicators for survival, readmissions, HT complications, and the onset of new comorbidities. We excluded studies that used clinician-reported and patient-experience outcomes. The Quality in Prognosis Studies tool (QUIPS) was used to measure the risk of bias of the included studies. RESULTS: We included five observational studies between 1987 and 2015, whose populations’ mean age ranged from 43 to 56 years and presented a higher proportion of males than females. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire demonstrated a negative correlation with readmissions (coefficient = − 1.177, p = 0.031), and the EQ-5D showed a negative correlation with the onset of neuromuscular disease after HT (coefficient = − 0.158, p < 0.001). The Millon Behavioral Health Inventory and the Nottingham Health Profile demonstrated a statistically significant association as survival predictors (p = 0.002 and p < 0.05, respectively). A moderate overall risk of bias was reported in three studies, one study resulted in a low risk of bias, and a proportion of more than 75% of males in each of the studies. High heterogeneity between the studies impeded establishing a link between PROMs and prognostic value. CONCLUSION: There is low evidence supporting PROMs usage as prognostic tools in adult HT patients. Comparing outcomes of PROMS to routine prognostic in wider and systematic settings is warranted. Systematic use of PROMs in clinical settings is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00431-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8924738/ /pubmed/35294633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00431-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Villa, Bernardo Perez Alotaibi, Sultan Brozzi, Nicolas Spindler, Kurt P. Navia, Jose Hernandez-Montfort, Jaime Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title | Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title_full | Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title_short | Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
title_sort | prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures in adult heart-transplant patients: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00431-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villabernardoperez prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview AT alotaibisultan prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview AT brozzinicolas prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview AT spindlerkurtp prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview AT naviajose prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview AT hernandezmontfortjaime prognosticvalueofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinadulthearttransplantpatientsasystematicreview |