Cargando…
Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
[Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular struc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446 |
_version_ | 1784669951605342208 |
---|---|
author | Reishofer, David Resel, Roland Sattelkow, Jürgen Fischer, Wolfgang J. Niegelhell, Katrin Mohan, Tamilselvan Kleinschek, Karin Stana Amenitsch, Heinz Plank, Harald Tammelin, Tekla Kontturi, Eero Spirk, Stefan |
author_facet | Reishofer, David Resel, Roland Sattelkow, Jürgen Fischer, Wolfgang J. Niegelhell, Katrin Mohan, Tamilselvan Kleinschek, Karin Stana Amenitsch, Heinz Plank, Harald Tammelin, Tekla Kontturi, Eero Spirk, Stefan |
author_sort | Reishofer, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular structure. Here, we study the humidity response of different, well-defined, ultrathin cellulose films as a function of industrially relevant treatments using different techniques. As treatments, drying at elevated temperature, swelling, and swelling followed by drying at elevated temperatures were chosen. The cellulose films were prepared by spin coating a soluble cellulose derivative, trimethylsilyl cellulose, onto solid substrates followed by conversion to cellulose by HCl vapor. For the highest investigated humidity levels (97%), the layer thickness increased by ca. 40% corresponding to the incorporation of 3.6 molecules of water per anhydroglucose unit (AGU), independent of the cellulose source used. The aforementioned treatments affected this ratio significantly with drying being the most notable procedure (2.0 and 2.6 molecules per AGU). The alterations were investigated in real time with X-ray reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, equipped with a humidity module to obtain information about changes in the thickness, roughness, and electron density of the films and qualitatively confirmed using grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering measurements using synchrotron irradiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8924868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89248682022-03-16 Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films Reishofer, David Resel, Roland Sattelkow, Jürgen Fischer, Wolfgang J. Niegelhell, Katrin Mohan, Tamilselvan Kleinschek, Karin Stana Amenitsch, Heinz Plank, Harald Tammelin, Tekla Kontturi, Eero Spirk, Stefan Biomacromolecules [Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular structure. Here, we study the humidity response of different, well-defined, ultrathin cellulose films as a function of industrially relevant treatments using different techniques. As treatments, drying at elevated temperature, swelling, and swelling followed by drying at elevated temperatures were chosen. The cellulose films were prepared by spin coating a soluble cellulose derivative, trimethylsilyl cellulose, onto solid substrates followed by conversion to cellulose by HCl vapor. For the highest investigated humidity levels (97%), the layer thickness increased by ca. 40% corresponding to the incorporation of 3.6 molecules of water per anhydroglucose unit (AGU), independent of the cellulose source used. The aforementioned treatments affected this ratio significantly with drying being the most notable procedure (2.0 and 2.6 molecules per AGU). The alterations were investigated in real time with X-ray reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, equipped with a humidity module to obtain information about changes in the thickness, roughness, and electron density of the films and qualitatively confirmed using grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering measurements using synchrotron irradiation. American Chemical Society 2022-02-28 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8924868/ /pubmed/35225593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Reishofer, David Resel, Roland Sattelkow, Jürgen Fischer, Wolfgang J. Niegelhell, Katrin Mohan, Tamilselvan Kleinschek, Karin Stana Amenitsch, Heinz Plank, Harald Tammelin, Tekla Kontturi, Eero Spirk, Stefan Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title | Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title_full | Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title_fullStr | Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title_full_unstemmed | Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title_short | Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films |
title_sort | humidity response of cellulose thin films |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reishoferdavid humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT reselroland humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT sattelkowjurgen humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT fischerwolfgangj humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT niegelhellkatrin humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT mohantamilselvan humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT kleinschekkarinstana humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT amenitschheinz humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT plankharald humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT tammelintekla humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT kontturieero humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms AT spirkstefan humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms |