Cargando…

Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films

[Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular struc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reishofer, David, Resel, Roland, Sattelkow, Jürgen, Fischer, Wolfgang J., Niegelhell, Katrin, Mohan, Tamilselvan, Kleinschek, Karin Stana, Amenitsch, Heinz, Plank, Harald, Tammelin, Tekla, Kontturi, Eero, Spirk, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446
_version_ 1784669951605342208
author Reishofer, David
Resel, Roland
Sattelkow, Jürgen
Fischer, Wolfgang J.
Niegelhell, Katrin
Mohan, Tamilselvan
Kleinschek, Karin Stana
Amenitsch, Heinz
Plank, Harald
Tammelin, Tekla
Kontturi, Eero
Spirk, Stefan
author_facet Reishofer, David
Resel, Roland
Sattelkow, Jürgen
Fischer, Wolfgang J.
Niegelhell, Katrin
Mohan, Tamilselvan
Kleinschek, Karin Stana
Amenitsch, Heinz
Plank, Harald
Tammelin, Tekla
Kontturi, Eero
Spirk, Stefan
author_sort Reishofer, David
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular structure. Here, we study the humidity response of different, well-defined, ultrathin cellulose films as a function of industrially relevant treatments using different techniques. As treatments, drying at elevated temperature, swelling, and swelling followed by drying at elevated temperatures were chosen. The cellulose films were prepared by spin coating a soluble cellulose derivative, trimethylsilyl cellulose, onto solid substrates followed by conversion to cellulose by HCl vapor. For the highest investigated humidity levels (97%), the layer thickness increased by ca. 40% corresponding to the incorporation of 3.6 molecules of water per anhydroglucose unit (AGU), independent of the cellulose source used. The aforementioned treatments affected this ratio significantly with drying being the most notable procedure (2.0 and 2.6 molecules per AGU). The alterations were investigated in real time with X-ray reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, equipped with a humidity module to obtain information about changes in the thickness, roughness, and electron density of the films and qualitatively confirmed using grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering measurements using synchrotron irradiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8924868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89248682022-03-16 Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films Reishofer, David Resel, Roland Sattelkow, Jürgen Fischer, Wolfgang J. Niegelhell, Katrin Mohan, Tamilselvan Kleinschek, Karin Stana Amenitsch, Heinz Plank, Harald Tammelin, Tekla Kontturi, Eero Spirk, Stefan Biomacromolecules [Image: see text] Cellulose–water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular structure. Here, we study the humidity response of different, well-defined, ultrathin cellulose films as a function of industrially relevant treatments using different techniques. As treatments, drying at elevated temperature, swelling, and swelling followed by drying at elevated temperatures were chosen. The cellulose films were prepared by spin coating a soluble cellulose derivative, trimethylsilyl cellulose, onto solid substrates followed by conversion to cellulose by HCl vapor. For the highest investigated humidity levels (97%), the layer thickness increased by ca. 40% corresponding to the incorporation of 3.6 molecules of water per anhydroglucose unit (AGU), independent of the cellulose source used. The aforementioned treatments affected this ratio significantly with drying being the most notable procedure (2.0 and 2.6 molecules per AGU). The alterations were investigated in real time with X-ray reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, equipped with a humidity module to obtain information about changes in the thickness, roughness, and electron density of the films and qualitatively confirmed using grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering measurements using synchrotron irradiation. American Chemical Society 2022-02-28 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8924868/ /pubmed/35225593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Reishofer, David
Resel, Roland
Sattelkow, Jürgen
Fischer, Wolfgang J.
Niegelhell, Katrin
Mohan, Tamilselvan
Kleinschek, Karin Stana
Amenitsch, Heinz
Plank, Harald
Tammelin, Tekla
Kontturi, Eero
Spirk, Stefan
Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title_full Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title_fullStr Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title_full_unstemmed Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title_short Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films
title_sort humidity response of cellulose thin films
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35225593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01446
work_keys_str_mv AT reishoferdavid humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT reselroland humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT sattelkowjurgen humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT fischerwolfgangj humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT niegelhellkatrin humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT mohantamilselvan humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT kleinschekkarinstana humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT amenitschheinz humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT plankharald humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT tammelintekla humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT kontturieero humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms
AT spirkstefan humidityresponseofcellulosethinfilms