Cargando…
Potential impact of systematic and random errors in blood pressure measurement on the prevalence of high office blood pressure in the United States
The authors examined the proportion of US adults that would have their high blood pressure (BP) status changed if systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were measured with systematic bias and/or random error versus following a standardized protocol. Data from the 2017–2018 National Health and Nutr...
Autores principales: | Sakhuja, Swati, Jaeger, Byron C., Akinyelure, Oluwasegun P., Bress, Adam P., Shimbo, Daichi, Schwartz, Joseph E., Hardy, Shakia T., Howard, George, Drawz, Paul, Muntner, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14418 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How should we measure blood pressure? Implications of the fourth blood pressure measurement in office blood pressure
por: Vischer, Annina S., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Office blood pressure measurement: A comprehensive review
por: Siddique, Saulat, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Blood pressure measurement and blood pressure control in Veterans Affairs medical centers
por: Halloran, Meghan O’, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Clinical relevance of double‐arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter‐arm blood pressure differences in Indian primary care
por: Wander, Gurpreet S., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Blood pressure measurement: Should technique define targets?
por: Hiremath, Swapnil, et al.
Publicado: (2021)