Cargando…
A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence, particularly the deep learning (DL) model, can provide reliable results for automated cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measurement on chest X-ray (CXR) images. In everyday clinical use, however, this technology is usually implemented in a non-automated (AI-assisted) ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00767-9 |
_version_ | 1784670004708376576 |
---|---|
author | Saiviroonporn, Pairash Wonglaksanapimon, Suwimon Chaisangmongkon, Warasinee Chamveha, Isarun Yodprom, Pakorn Butnian, Krittachat Siriapisith, Thanogchai Tongdee, Trongtum |
author_facet | Saiviroonporn, Pairash Wonglaksanapimon, Suwimon Chaisangmongkon, Warasinee Chamveha, Isarun Yodprom, Pakorn Butnian, Krittachat Siriapisith, Thanogchai Tongdee, Trongtum |
author_sort | Saiviroonporn, Pairash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence, particularly the deep learning (DL) model, can provide reliable results for automated cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measurement on chest X-ray (CXR) images. In everyday clinical use, however, this technology is usually implemented in a non-automated (AI-assisted) capacity because it still requires approval from radiologists. We investigated the performance and efficiency of our recently proposed models for the AI-assisted method intended for clinical practice. METHODS: We validated four proposed DL models (AlbuNet, SegNet, VGG-11, and VGG-16) to find the best model for clinical implementation using a dataset of 7517 CXR images from manual operations. These models were investigated in single-model and combined-model modes to find the model with the highest percentage of results where the user could accept the results without further interaction (excellent grade), and with measurement variation within ± 1.8% of the human-operating range. The best model from the validation study was then tested on an evaluation dataset of 9386 CXR images using the AI-assisted method with two radiologists to measure the yield of excellent grade results, observer variation, and operating time. A Bland–Altman plot with coefficient of variation (CV) was employed to evaluate agreement between measurements. RESULTS: The VGG-16 gave the highest excellent grade result (68.9%) of any single-model mode with a CV comparable to manual operation (2.12% vs 2.13%). No DL model produced a failure-grade result. The combined-model mode of AlbuNet + VGG-11 model yielded excellent grades in 82.7% of images and a CV of 1.36%. Using the evaluation dataset, the AlbuNet + VGG-11 model produced excellent grade results in 77.8% of images, a CV of 1.55%, and reduced CTR measurement time by almost ten-fold (1.07 ± 2.62 s vs 10.6 ± 1.5 s) compared with manual operation. CONCLUSION: Due to its excellent accuracy and speed, the AlbuNet + VGG-11 model could be clinically implemented to assist radiologists with CTR measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8925133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89251332022-03-23 A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence Saiviroonporn, Pairash Wonglaksanapimon, Suwimon Chaisangmongkon, Warasinee Chamveha, Isarun Yodprom, Pakorn Butnian, Krittachat Siriapisith, Thanogchai Tongdee, Trongtum BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence, particularly the deep learning (DL) model, can provide reliable results for automated cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measurement on chest X-ray (CXR) images. In everyday clinical use, however, this technology is usually implemented in a non-automated (AI-assisted) capacity because it still requires approval from radiologists. We investigated the performance and efficiency of our recently proposed models for the AI-assisted method intended for clinical practice. METHODS: We validated four proposed DL models (AlbuNet, SegNet, VGG-11, and VGG-16) to find the best model for clinical implementation using a dataset of 7517 CXR images from manual operations. These models were investigated in single-model and combined-model modes to find the model with the highest percentage of results where the user could accept the results without further interaction (excellent grade), and with measurement variation within ± 1.8% of the human-operating range. The best model from the validation study was then tested on an evaluation dataset of 9386 CXR images using the AI-assisted method with two radiologists to measure the yield of excellent grade results, observer variation, and operating time. A Bland–Altman plot with coefficient of variation (CV) was employed to evaluate agreement between measurements. RESULTS: The VGG-16 gave the highest excellent grade result (68.9%) of any single-model mode with a CV comparable to manual operation (2.12% vs 2.13%). No DL model produced a failure-grade result. The combined-model mode of AlbuNet + VGG-11 model yielded excellent grades in 82.7% of images and a CV of 1.36%. Using the evaluation dataset, the AlbuNet + VGG-11 model produced excellent grade results in 77.8% of images, a CV of 1.55%, and reduced CTR measurement time by almost ten-fold (1.07 ± 2.62 s vs 10.6 ± 1.5 s) compared with manual operation. CONCLUSION: Due to its excellent accuracy and speed, the AlbuNet + VGG-11 model could be clinically implemented to assist radiologists with CTR measurement. BioMed Central 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8925133/ /pubmed/35296262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00767-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Saiviroonporn, Pairash Wonglaksanapimon, Suwimon Chaisangmongkon, Warasinee Chamveha, Isarun Yodprom, Pakorn Butnian, Krittachat Siriapisith, Thanogchai Tongdee, Trongtum A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title | A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title_full | A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title_fullStr | A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title_short | A clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
title_sort | clinical evaluation study of cardiothoracic ratio measurement using artificial intelligence |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00767-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saiviroonpornpairash aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT wonglaksanapimonsuwimon aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT chaisangmongkonwarasinee aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT chamvehaisarun aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT yodprompakorn aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT butniankrittachat aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT siriapisiththanogchai aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT tongdeetrongtum aclinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT saiviroonpornpairash clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT wonglaksanapimonsuwimon clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT chaisangmongkonwarasinee clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT chamvehaisarun clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT yodprompakorn clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT butniankrittachat clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT siriapisiththanogchai clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence AT tongdeetrongtum clinicalevaluationstudyofcardiothoracicratiomeasurementusingartificialintelligence |