Cargando…
Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T
BACKGROUND: To compare image quality, lesion detection and patient comfort of 3T prostate MRI using a combined rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil and an external phased-array coil (ERC-PAC) compared to external PAC acquisition in the same patients. METHODS: Thirty three men (mean age 65....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00453-7 |
_version_ | 1784670009789775872 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Sara Ganti, Aasrith Argiriadi, Pamela Rosen, Ally Hectors, Stefanie Semaan, Sahar Song, Christopher Peti, Steve Segall, Maxwell George, Kezia Jaikaran, Vaneela Villa, Sebastian Kestenbaum, David Voutsinas, Nicholas Doucette, John Tewari, Ashutosh Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Taouli, Bachir |
author_facet | Lewis, Sara Ganti, Aasrith Argiriadi, Pamela Rosen, Ally Hectors, Stefanie Semaan, Sahar Song, Christopher Peti, Steve Segall, Maxwell George, Kezia Jaikaran, Vaneela Villa, Sebastian Kestenbaum, David Voutsinas, Nicholas Doucette, John Tewari, Ashutosh Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Taouli, Bachir |
author_sort | Lewis, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare image quality, lesion detection and patient comfort of 3T prostate MRI using a combined rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil and an external phased-array coil (ERC-PAC) compared to external PAC acquisition in the same patients. METHODS: Thirty three men (mean age 65.3y) with suspected (n = 15) or biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa, n = 18) were prospectively enrolled in this exploratory study. 3T prostate MRI including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using an ERC-PAC versus PAC alone, in random order. Image quality, lesion detection and characterization (biparametric PI-RADSv2.1) were evaluated by 2 independent observers. Estimated signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) was measured in identified lesions and the peripheral zone (PZ). Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were compared between sequences and acquisitions. Inter/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty four prostate lesions (22 PCa) were identified in 20/33 men. Superior image quality was found for ERC-PAC compared to PAC for T2WI for one observer (Obs.1, p < 0.03) and high b-value DWI for both observers (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of PI-RADS for lesion detection for ERC-PAC and PAC acquisitions was 79.2 and 75% for Obs.1, and 79.1 and 66.7%, for Obs.2, without significant difference for each observer (McNemar p-values ≥0.08). Inter−/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was moderate-to-substantial (kappa = 0.52–0.84). Higher eSNR was observed for lesions and PZ for T2WI and PZ for DWI using ERC-PAC (p < 0.013). Most patients (21/33) reported discomfort at ERC insertion. CONCLUSION: Despite improved image quality and eSNR using the rigid ERC-PAC combination, no significant improvement in lesion detection was observed, therefore not supporting the routine use of ERC for prostate MRI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00453-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8925156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89251562022-03-23 Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T Lewis, Sara Ganti, Aasrith Argiriadi, Pamela Rosen, Ally Hectors, Stefanie Semaan, Sahar Song, Christopher Peti, Steve Segall, Maxwell George, Kezia Jaikaran, Vaneela Villa, Sebastian Kestenbaum, David Voutsinas, Nicholas Doucette, John Tewari, Ashutosh Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Taouli, Bachir Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare image quality, lesion detection and patient comfort of 3T prostate MRI using a combined rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil and an external phased-array coil (ERC-PAC) compared to external PAC acquisition in the same patients. METHODS: Thirty three men (mean age 65.3y) with suspected (n = 15) or biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa, n = 18) were prospectively enrolled in this exploratory study. 3T prostate MRI including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using an ERC-PAC versus PAC alone, in random order. Image quality, lesion detection and characterization (biparametric PI-RADSv2.1) were evaluated by 2 independent observers. Estimated signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) was measured in identified lesions and the peripheral zone (PZ). Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were compared between sequences and acquisitions. Inter/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty four prostate lesions (22 PCa) were identified in 20/33 men. Superior image quality was found for ERC-PAC compared to PAC for T2WI for one observer (Obs.1, p < 0.03) and high b-value DWI for both observers (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of PI-RADS for lesion detection for ERC-PAC and PAC acquisitions was 79.2 and 75% for Obs.1, and 79.1 and 66.7%, for Obs.2, without significant difference for each observer (McNemar p-values ≥0.08). Inter−/intra-observer agreement for PI-RADS scores was moderate-to-substantial (kappa = 0.52–0.84). Higher eSNR was observed for lesions and PZ for T2WI and PZ for DWI using ERC-PAC (p < 0.013). Most patients (21/33) reported discomfort at ERC insertion. CONCLUSION: Despite improved image quality and eSNR using the rigid ERC-PAC combination, no significant improvement in lesion detection was observed, therefore not supporting the routine use of ERC for prostate MRI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00453-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8925156/ /pubmed/35296357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00453-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lewis, Sara Ganti, Aasrith Argiriadi, Pamela Rosen, Ally Hectors, Stefanie Semaan, Sahar Song, Christopher Peti, Steve Segall, Maxwell George, Kezia Jaikaran, Vaneela Villa, Sebastian Kestenbaum, David Voutsinas, Nicholas Doucette, John Tewari, Ashutosh Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. Taouli, Bachir Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title | Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title_full | Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title_fullStr | Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title_short | Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T |
title_sort | prostate mri using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 t |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00453-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewissara prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT gantiaasrith prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT argiriadipamela prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT rosenally prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT hectorsstefanie prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT semaansahar prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT songchristopher prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT petisteve prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT segallmaxwell prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT georgekezia prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT jaikaranvaneela prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT villasebastian prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT kestenbaumdavid prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT voutsinasnicholas prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT doucettejohn prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT tewariashutosh prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT rastinehadardeshirr prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t AT taoulibachir prostatemriusingarigidtwochannelphasedarrayendorectalcoilcomparisonwithphasedarraycoilacquisitionat3t |