Cargando…

Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks

BACKGROUND: Rearing systems can affect livestock production directly, but whether they have effects on intestinal growth states and ceca microorganisms in ducks is largely unclear. The current study used Nonghua ducks to estimate the effects of rearing systems on the intestines by evaluating differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xuefei, Huang, Liansi, Cheng, Lumin, Hu, Bo, Liu, Hehe, Hu, Jiwei, Hu, Shenqiang, Han, Chunchun, He, Hua, Kang, Bo, Xu, Hengyong, Wang, Jiwen, Li, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02478-1
_version_ 1784670012325232640
author Chen, Xuefei
Huang, Liansi
Cheng, Lumin
Hu, Bo
Liu, Hehe
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Shenqiang
Han, Chunchun
He, Hua
Kang, Bo
Xu, Hengyong
Wang, Jiwen
Li, Liang
author_facet Chen, Xuefei
Huang, Liansi
Cheng, Lumin
Hu, Bo
Liu, Hehe
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Shenqiang
Han, Chunchun
He, Hua
Kang, Bo
Xu, Hengyong
Wang, Jiwen
Li, Liang
author_sort Chen, Xuefei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rearing systems can affect livestock production directly, but whether they have effects on intestinal growth states and ceca microorganisms in ducks is largely unclear. The current study used Nonghua ducks to estimate the effects of rearing systems on the intestines by evaluating differences in intestinal growth indices and cecal microorganisms between ducks in the floor-rearing system (FRS) and net-rearing system (NRS). RESULTS: The values of relative weight (RW), relative length (RL) and RW/RL of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ceca in the FRS were significantly higher than those in the NRS during weeks 4, 8 and 13 (p < 0.05). A total of 157 genera were identified from ducks under the two systems, and the dominant microorganisms in both treatments were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria at the phylum level. The distribution of microorganisms in the ceca of the two treatments showed significant separation during the three time periods, and the value of the Simpson index in the FRS was significantly higher than that in the NRS at 13 weeks (p < 0.05). Five differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 4, seven differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 8, and four differential microorganisms and two differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 13. CONCLUSIONS: The rearing system influences duck intestinal development and microorganisms. The FRS group had higher intestinal RL, RW and RW/RL and obviously separated ceca microorganisms compared to those of the NRS group. The differential metabolic pathways of cecal microorganisms decreased with increasing age, and the abundance of translation pathways was higher in the NRS group at week 13, while cofactor and vitamin metabolism were more abundant in the FRS group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8925166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89251662022-03-23 Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks Chen, Xuefei Huang, Liansi Cheng, Lumin Hu, Bo Liu, Hehe Hu, Jiwei Hu, Shenqiang Han, Chunchun He, Hua Kang, Bo Xu, Hengyong Wang, Jiwen Li, Liang BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Rearing systems can affect livestock production directly, but whether they have effects on intestinal growth states and ceca microorganisms in ducks is largely unclear. The current study used Nonghua ducks to estimate the effects of rearing systems on the intestines by evaluating differences in intestinal growth indices and cecal microorganisms between ducks in the floor-rearing system (FRS) and net-rearing system (NRS). RESULTS: The values of relative weight (RW), relative length (RL) and RW/RL of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and ceca in the FRS were significantly higher than those in the NRS during weeks 4, 8 and 13 (p < 0.05). A total of 157 genera were identified from ducks under the two systems, and the dominant microorganisms in both treatments were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria at the phylum level. The distribution of microorganisms in the ceca of the two treatments showed significant separation during the three time periods, and the value of the Simpson index in the FRS was significantly higher than that in the NRS at 13 weeks (p < 0.05). Five differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 4, seven differential microorganisms and 25 differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 8, and four differential microorganisms and two differential metabolic pathways were found in the ceca at week 13. CONCLUSIONS: The rearing system influences duck intestinal development and microorganisms. The FRS group had higher intestinal RL, RW and RW/RL and obviously separated ceca microorganisms compared to those of the NRS group. The differential metabolic pathways of cecal microorganisms decreased with increasing age, and the abundance of translation pathways was higher in the NRS group at week 13, while cofactor and vitamin metabolism were more abundant in the FRS group. BioMed Central 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8925166/ /pubmed/35296244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02478-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Xuefei
Huang, Liansi
Cheng, Lumin
Hu, Bo
Liu, Hehe
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Shenqiang
Han, Chunchun
He, Hua
Kang, Bo
Xu, Hengyong
Wang, Jiwen
Li, Liang
Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title_full Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title_fullStr Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title_full_unstemmed Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title_short Effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
title_sort effects of floor- and net-rearing systems on intestinal growth and microbial diversity in the ceca of ducks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02478-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxuefei effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT huangliansi effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT chenglumin effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT hubo effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT liuhehe effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT hujiwei effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT hushenqiang effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT hanchunchun effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT hehua effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT kangbo effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT xuhengyong effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT wangjiwen effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks
AT liliang effectsoffloorandnetrearingsystemsonintestinalgrowthandmicrobialdiversityinthececaofducks