Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a new regional anesthesia technique that provides postoperative analgesia for breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery. The published papers are not yet fully integrated and do not adequately address the impact and safety of the RIB on postoperative pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ruirong, Su, Sheng, Shu, Haihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01599-4
_version_ 1784670014857543680
author Chen, Ruirong
Su, Sheng
Shu, Haihua
author_facet Chen, Ruirong
Su, Sheng
Shu, Haihua
author_sort Chen, Ruirong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a new regional anesthesia technique that provides postoperative analgesia for breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery. The published papers are not yet fully integrated and do not adequately address the impact and safety of the RIB on postoperative pain. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 2016 to 2021 for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of RIB after thoracic surgery and breast surgery. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary outcome was Postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of patients at rest recorded 0–1, 6–8, 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative fentanyl consumption and presence of complications of the block. RESULTS: From 81 records identified, four studies met our inclusion criteria, including 216 patients (RIB:108 patients; no block: 108 patients). In the primary outcome, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS at rest at first 0–1 h and 6–8 h (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.55; 95% confidence internal [CI] = -2.92 to -0.19; p < 0.05), (WMD = -0. 69; 95% CI = -1.29 to -0. 09; p < 0. 05). And there was no significant difference between groups in NRS at rest at 24 h (WMD = -0.78; 95% CI = -1.64 to -0.08; p = 0.77). Also, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS of breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery at 0-1 h (WMD = -3.00; 95% CI = -3.13 to -2.87; p < 0.01), (WMD = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.18; p < 0.05). In the secondary outcome, the analysis also showed RIB group had significant lower of POVN rates (summary relative risk (RR) = 0.212;95%CI = 0.10 to 0.45; p < 0. 01) and the postoperative consumption of fentanyl (WMD = -57.52;95%CI = -106.03 to -9.02; p < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: This review shows that RIB was more effective in controlling acute pain after breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery than general analgesia. And it is a trend that RIB may be a kind of effective and safe nerve bock technology and it requires further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8925179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89251792022-03-23 Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis Chen, Ruirong Su, Sheng Shu, Haihua BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) is a new regional anesthesia technique that provides postoperative analgesia for breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery. The published papers are not yet fully integrated and do not adequately address the impact and safety of the RIB on postoperative pain. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 2016 to 2021 for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of RIB after thoracic surgery and breast surgery. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary outcome was Postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores of patients at rest recorded 0–1, 6–8, 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative fentanyl consumption and presence of complications of the block. RESULTS: From 81 records identified, four studies met our inclusion criteria, including 216 patients (RIB:108 patients; no block: 108 patients). In the primary outcome, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS at rest at first 0–1 h and 6–8 h (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.55; 95% confidence internal [CI] = -2.92 to -0.19; p < 0.05), (WMD = -0. 69; 95% CI = -1.29 to -0. 09; p < 0. 05). And there was no significant difference between groups in NRS at rest at 24 h (WMD = -0.78; 95% CI = -1.64 to -0.08; p = 0.77). Also, RIB group showed significantly lower postoperative NRS of breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery at 0-1 h (WMD = -3.00; 95% CI = -3.13 to -2.87; p < 0.01), (WMD = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.98 to -0.18; p < 0.05). In the secondary outcome, the analysis also showed RIB group had significant lower of POVN rates (summary relative risk (RR) = 0.212;95%CI = 0.10 to 0.45; p < 0. 01) and the postoperative consumption of fentanyl (WMD = -57.52;95%CI = -106.03 to -9.02; p < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: This review shows that RIB was more effective in controlling acute pain after breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery than general analgesia. And it is a trend that RIB may be a kind of effective and safe nerve bock technology and it requires further studies. BioMed Central 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8925179/ /pubmed/35296252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01599-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Ruirong
Su, Sheng
Shu, Haihua
Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8925179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01599-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chenruirong efficacyandsafetyofrhomboidintercostalblockforanalgesiainbreastsurgeryandthoracoscopicsurgeryametaanalysis
AT susheng efficacyandsafetyofrhomboidintercostalblockforanalgesiainbreastsurgeryandthoracoscopicsurgeryametaanalysis
AT shuhaihua efficacyandsafetyofrhomboidintercostalblockforanalgesiainbreastsurgeryandthoracoscopicsurgeryametaanalysis