Cargando…

Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: For patients with substance use disorder (SUD), a peer recovery coach (PRC) intervention increases engagement in recovery services; effective support services interventions have occasionally demonstrated cost savings through decreased acute care utilization. OBJECTIVE: Examine effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cupp, Julia A., Byrne, Kaileigh A., Herbert, Kristin, Roth, Prerana J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w
_version_ 1784670161349902336
author Cupp, Julia A.
Byrne, Kaileigh A.
Herbert, Kristin
Roth, Prerana J.
author_facet Cupp, Julia A.
Byrne, Kaileigh A.
Herbert, Kristin
Roth, Prerana J.
author_sort Cupp, Julia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with substance use disorder (SUD), a peer recovery coach (PRC) intervention increases engagement in recovery services; effective support services interventions have occasionally demonstrated cost savings through decreased acute care utilization. OBJECTIVE: Examine effect of PRCs on acute care utilization. DESIGN: Combined results of 2 parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient adults with substance use disorder INTERVENTIONS: Inpatient PRC linkage and follow-up contact for 6 months vs usual care (providing contact information for SUD resources and PRCs) MAIN MEASURES: Acute care encounters (emergency and inpatient) 6 months before and after enrollment; encounter type by primary diagnosis code category (mental/behavioral vs medical); 30-day readmissions with Lace+ readmission risk scores. KEY RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were randomized: 95 PRC; 98 control. In the PRC intervention, 66 patients had a pre-enrollment acute care encounter and 56 had an encounter post-enrollment, compared to the control group with 59 pre- and 62 post-enrollment (odds ratio [OR] = −0.79, P = 0.11); there was no significant effect for sub-groups by encounter location (emergency vs inpatient). There was a significant decrease in mental/behavioral ED visits (PRC: pre-enrollment 17 vs post-enrollment 10; control: pre-enrollment 13 vs post-enrollment 16 (OR = −2.62, P = 0.02)) but not mental/behavioral inpatient encounters or medical emergency or inpatient encounters. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmissions corrected for Lace+ scores (15.8% PRC vs 17.3% control, OR = 0.19, P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: PRCs did not decrease overall acute care utilization but may decrease emergency encounters related to substance use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04098601, NCT04098614) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8926086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89260862022-03-17 Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials Cupp, Julia A. Byrne, Kaileigh A. Herbert, Kristin Roth, Prerana J. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: For patients with substance use disorder (SUD), a peer recovery coach (PRC) intervention increases engagement in recovery services; effective support services interventions have occasionally demonstrated cost savings through decreased acute care utilization. OBJECTIVE: Examine effect of PRCs on acute care utilization. DESIGN: Combined results of 2 parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient adults with substance use disorder INTERVENTIONS: Inpatient PRC linkage and follow-up contact for 6 months vs usual care (providing contact information for SUD resources and PRCs) MAIN MEASURES: Acute care encounters (emergency and inpatient) 6 months before and after enrollment; encounter type by primary diagnosis code category (mental/behavioral vs medical); 30-day readmissions with Lace+ readmission risk scores. KEY RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were randomized: 95 PRC; 98 control. In the PRC intervention, 66 patients had a pre-enrollment acute care encounter and 56 had an encounter post-enrollment, compared to the control group with 59 pre- and 62 post-enrollment (odds ratio [OR] = −0.79, P = 0.11); there was no significant effect for sub-groups by encounter location (emergency vs inpatient). There was a significant decrease in mental/behavioral ED visits (PRC: pre-enrollment 17 vs post-enrollment 10; control: pre-enrollment 13 vs post-enrollment 16 (OR = −2.62, P = 0.02)) but not mental/behavioral inpatient encounters or medical emergency or inpatient encounters. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmissions corrected for Lace+ scores (15.8% PRC vs 17.3% control, OR = 0.19, P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: PRCs did not decrease overall acute care utilization but may decrease emergency encounters related to substance use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04098601, NCT04098614) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-16 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8926086/ /pubmed/35296984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022
spellingShingle Original Research
Cupp, Julia A.
Byrne, Kaileigh A.
Herbert, Kristin
Roth, Prerana J.
Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort acute care utilization after recovery coaching linkage during substance-related inpatient admission: results of two randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07360-w
work_keys_str_mv AT cuppjuliaa acutecareutilizationafterrecoverycoachinglinkageduringsubstancerelatedinpatientadmissionresultsoftworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT byrnekaileigha acutecareutilizationafterrecoverycoachinglinkageduringsubstancerelatedinpatientadmissionresultsoftworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT herbertkristin acutecareutilizationafterrecoverycoachinglinkageduringsubstancerelatedinpatientadmissionresultsoftworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rothpreranaj acutecareutilizationafterrecoverycoachinglinkageduringsubstancerelatedinpatientadmissionresultsoftworandomizedcontrolledtrials