Cargando…

Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death among Chinese Americans (CAs). Although death rates of cancers can be significantly reduced by screening cancers at an early stage, cancer screening (CS) rates are low among CAs. Interventions on CS may increase the uptake rates of CS and help to decr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Fang, Zheng, Ying, Lee, Eunice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265201
_version_ 1784670201829130240
author Lei, Fang
Zheng, Ying
Lee, Eunice
author_facet Lei, Fang
Zheng, Ying
Lee, Eunice
author_sort Lei, Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death among Chinese Americans (CAs). Although death rates of cancers can be significantly reduced by screening cancers at an early stage, cancer screening (CS) rates are low among CAs. Interventions on CS may increase the uptake rates of CS and help to decrease the death rates of cancers in CAs. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to summarize the intervention methods on CS among CAs and compare effects of various intervention methods on the outcomes of CS, including knowledge levels of CS, intentions to complete CS, and actual completions of CS. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis design was used. Keyword searching was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Data was analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. Random effect model and subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 13 eligible studies. All of the reviewed interventions were culturally tailored. Systematic review results were categorized by intervention delivery objects, intervention led, intervention contact, intervention types, and intervention focus according to group consensus. Meta-analysis results showed that the interventions on CS had a positive effect on all outcomes, including a 1.58 (95% CI, 1.17–2.14; P = 0.003), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.27–2.48; P = 0.0007), and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.22–2.42; P = 0.002) effect on knowledge of CS, intentions to complete CS, and completions of CS, respectively, compared to the control group. The subgroup analysis suggested that physician-led, individual-based, face-to-face client-focused interventions with multiple components increased CS among CAs, with the OR ranging from 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08–2.39; P = 0.02) to 3.11 (95%CI, 1.02–9.49; P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Interventions on CS significantly increased CAs’ knowledge of CS, intentions to complete CS, and completions of CS. Physician-led, individual-based, face-to-face client-focused interventions with multiple components should be utilized for CAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8926258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89262582022-03-17 Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lei, Fang Zheng, Ying Lee, Eunice PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death among Chinese Americans (CAs). Although death rates of cancers can be significantly reduced by screening cancers at an early stage, cancer screening (CS) rates are low among CAs. Interventions on CS may increase the uptake rates of CS and help to decrease the death rates of cancers in CAs. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to summarize the intervention methods on CS among CAs and compare effects of various intervention methods on the outcomes of CS, including knowledge levels of CS, intentions to complete CS, and actual completions of CS. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis design was used. Keyword searching was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Data was analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. Random effect model and subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 13 eligible studies. All of the reviewed interventions were culturally tailored. Systematic review results were categorized by intervention delivery objects, intervention led, intervention contact, intervention types, and intervention focus according to group consensus. Meta-analysis results showed that the interventions on CS had a positive effect on all outcomes, including a 1.58 (95% CI, 1.17–2.14; P = 0.003), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.27–2.48; P = 0.0007), and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.22–2.42; P = 0.002) effect on knowledge of CS, intentions to complete CS, and completions of CS, respectively, compared to the control group. The subgroup analysis suggested that physician-led, individual-based, face-to-face client-focused interventions with multiple components increased CS among CAs, with the OR ranging from 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08–2.39; P = 0.02) to 3.11 (95%CI, 1.02–9.49; P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Interventions on CS significantly increased CAs’ knowledge of CS, intentions to complete CS, and completions of CS. Physician-led, individual-based, face-to-face client-focused interventions with multiple components should be utilized for CAs. Public Library of Science 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8926258/ /pubmed/35294463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265201 Text en © 2022 Lei et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lei, Fang
Zheng, Ying
Lee, Eunice
Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort interventions for cancer screening among chinese americans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265201
work_keys_str_mv AT leifang interventionsforcancerscreeningamongchineseamericansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengying interventionsforcancerscreeningamongchineseamericansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeeunice interventionsforcancerscreeningamongchineseamericansasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis