Cargando…

Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy

BACKGROUND: The combination of the antihistamine azelastine (AZE) with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) in a single spray, has been reported to be significantly more effective at reducing allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms than treatment with either corticosteroid or antihistamine monothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watts, Annabelle M., West, Nicholas P., Smith, Peter K., Zhang, Ping, Cripps, Allan W., Cox, Amanda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.571
_version_ 1784670250017488896
author Watts, Annabelle M.
West, Nicholas P.
Smith, Peter K.
Zhang, Ping
Cripps, Allan W.
Cox, Amanda J.
author_facet Watts, Annabelle M.
West, Nicholas P.
Smith, Peter K.
Zhang, Ping
Cripps, Allan W.
Cox, Amanda J.
author_sort Watts, Annabelle M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of the antihistamine azelastine (AZE) with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) in a single spray, has been reported to be significantly more effective at reducing allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms than treatment with either corticosteroid or antihistamine monotherapy. However, the biological basis for enhanced symptom relief is not known. This study aimed to compare gene expression profiles (760 immune genes, performed with the NanoString nCounter) from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples in response to nasal spray treatment. METHODS: Moderate/severe persistent dust mite AR sufferers received either AZE (125 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 16), FP (50 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 14) or combination spray AZE/FP (125 μg AZE and 50 μg FP/spray) (n = 14) for 7 days, twice daily. Self‐reported symptom questionnaires were completed daily for the study duration. Gene expression analysis (760 immune genes) was performed with the NanoString nCounter on purified RNA from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples. RESULTS: In nasal samples, 206 genes were significantly differentially expressed following FP treatment; 182 genes downregulated (−2.57 to −0.45 Log2 fold change [FC]), 24 genes upregulated (0.49–1.40 Log2 FC). In response to AZE/FP, only 16 genes were significantly differentially expressed; 10 genes downregulated (−1.53 to −0.58 Log2 FC), six genes upregulated (1.07–1.62 Log2 FC). Following AZE treatment only five genes were significantly differentially expressed; one gene downregulated (−1.68 Log2 FC), four genes upregulated (0.59–1.19 Log2 FC). Immune gene changes in peripheral blood samples following treatment were minimal. AR symptoms improved under all treatments, but improvements were less pronounced following AZE treatment. CONCLUSION: AZE/FP, FP, and AZE had diverse effects on immune gene expression profiles in nasal mucosa samples. The moderate number of genes modulated by AZE/FP indicates alternative pathways in reducing AR symptoms whilst avoiding extensive local immune suppression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8926499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89264992022-03-24 Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy Watts, Annabelle M. West, Nicholas P. Smith, Peter K. Zhang, Ping Cripps, Allan W. Cox, Amanda J. Immun Inflamm Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: The combination of the antihistamine azelastine (AZE) with the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) in a single spray, has been reported to be significantly more effective at reducing allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms than treatment with either corticosteroid or antihistamine monotherapy. However, the biological basis for enhanced symptom relief is not known. This study aimed to compare gene expression profiles (760 immune genes, performed with the NanoString nCounter) from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples in response to nasal spray treatment. METHODS: Moderate/severe persistent dust mite AR sufferers received either AZE (125 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 16), FP (50 μg/spray) nasal spray (n = 14) or combination spray AZE/FP (125 μg AZE and 50 μg FP/spray) (n = 14) for 7 days, twice daily. Self‐reported symptom questionnaires were completed daily for the study duration. Gene expression analysis (760 immune genes) was performed with the NanoString nCounter on purified RNA from peripheral blood and nasal brushing/lavage lysate samples. RESULTS: In nasal samples, 206 genes were significantly differentially expressed following FP treatment; 182 genes downregulated (−2.57 to −0.45 Log2 fold change [FC]), 24 genes upregulated (0.49–1.40 Log2 FC). In response to AZE/FP, only 16 genes were significantly differentially expressed; 10 genes downregulated (−1.53 to −0.58 Log2 FC), six genes upregulated (1.07–1.62 Log2 FC). Following AZE treatment only five genes were significantly differentially expressed; one gene downregulated (−1.68 Log2 FC), four genes upregulated (0.59–1.19 Log2 FC). Immune gene changes in peripheral blood samples following treatment were minimal. AR symptoms improved under all treatments, but improvements were less pronounced following AZE treatment. CONCLUSION: AZE/FP, FP, and AZE had diverse effects on immune gene expression profiles in nasal mucosa samples. The moderate number of genes modulated by AZE/FP indicates alternative pathways in reducing AR symptoms whilst avoiding extensive local immune suppression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8926499/ /pubmed/34813682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.571 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Watts, Annabelle M.
West, Nicholas P.
Smith, Peter K.
Zhang, Ping
Cripps, Allan W.
Cox, Amanda J.
Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title_full Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title_fullStr Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title_short Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
title_sort nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8926499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.571
work_keys_str_mv AT wattsannabellem nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy
AT westnicholasp nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy
AT smithpeterk nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy
AT zhangping nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy
AT crippsallanw nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy
AT coxamandaj nasalimmunegeneexpressioninresponsetoazelastineandfluticasonepropionatecombinationormonotherapy