Cargando…
Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is commonly employed during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, frequent TAVR is associated with worse prognoses. The retrograde INOUE-BALLOON(®) (IB) allows balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) without RVP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34110610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12928-021-00789-0 |
_version_ | 1784670361947734016 |
---|---|
author | Ninomiya, Ryo Yoshizawa, Michiko Koeda, Yorihiko Ishikawa, Yu Kumagai, Akiko Ishida, Masaru Takahashi, Fumiaki Fusazaki, Tetsuya Tashiro, Atsushi Kin, Hajime Morino, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Ninomiya, Ryo Yoshizawa, Michiko Koeda, Yorihiko Ishikawa, Yu Kumagai, Akiko Ishida, Masaru Takahashi, Fumiaki Fusazaki, Tetsuya Tashiro, Atsushi Kin, Hajime Morino, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Ninomiya, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is commonly employed during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, frequent TAVR is associated with worse prognoses. The retrograde INOUE-BALLOON(®) (IB) allows balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) without RVP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of retrograde IB for TAVR preparation. The study population included 178 consecutive patients (mean age, 84 ± 5 years; male, 47%) who underwent retrograde BAV before prosthetic valve replacement via the transfemoral approach. Patients were divided into a retrograde IB group without RVP (n = 74) and a conventional balloon (CB) group with RVP (n = 104). The primary endpoint was prolonged hypotension after BAV (reduced systolic pressure < 80 mmHg for over 1 min or vasopressor drug requirement). The incidence of prolonged hypotension after BAV was significantly lower in the IB group compared with the CB group (4% vs. 16%, p = 0.011). Balloons were able to penetrate and expand the aortic valve in both groups. RVP was used less for total TAVR in the IB group compared with the CB group. The aortic valve area-index after BAV was not significantly different between the two groups (0.72 ± 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 cm(2)/m(2); p = 0.856). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IB use was associated with avoidance of prolonged hypotension (OR, 0.27 [0.059–0.952]; p = 0.041). In conclusion, BAV using retrograde IB without RVP is both safe and feasible. More stable hemodynamics were achieved using retrograde IB by avoiding RVP during TAVR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12928-021-00789-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8927037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89270372022-03-22 Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement Ninomiya, Ryo Yoshizawa, Michiko Koeda, Yorihiko Ishikawa, Yu Kumagai, Akiko Ishida, Masaru Takahashi, Fumiaki Fusazaki, Tetsuya Tashiro, Atsushi Kin, Hajime Morino, Yoshihiro Cardiovasc Interv Ther Original Article Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is commonly employed during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, frequent TAVR is associated with worse prognoses. The retrograde INOUE-BALLOON(®) (IB) allows balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) without RVP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of retrograde IB for TAVR preparation. The study population included 178 consecutive patients (mean age, 84 ± 5 years; male, 47%) who underwent retrograde BAV before prosthetic valve replacement via the transfemoral approach. Patients were divided into a retrograde IB group without RVP (n = 74) and a conventional balloon (CB) group with RVP (n = 104). The primary endpoint was prolonged hypotension after BAV (reduced systolic pressure < 80 mmHg for over 1 min or vasopressor drug requirement). The incidence of prolonged hypotension after BAV was significantly lower in the IB group compared with the CB group (4% vs. 16%, p = 0.011). Balloons were able to penetrate and expand the aortic valve in both groups. RVP was used less for total TAVR in the IB group compared with the CB group. The aortic valve area-index after BAV was not significantly different between the two groups (0.72 ± 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 cm(2)/m(2); p = 0.856). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IB use was associated with avoidance of prolonged hypotension (OR, 0.27 [0.059–0.952]; p = 0.041). In conclusion, BAV using retrograde IB without RVP is both safe and feasible. More stable hemodynamics were achieved using retrograde IB by avoiding RVP during TAVR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12928-021-00789-0. Springer Singapore 2021-06-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8927037/ /pubmed/34110610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12928-021-00789-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, Corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ninomiya, Ryo Yoshizawa, Michiko Koeda, Yorihiko Ishikawa, Yu Kumagai, Akiko Ishida, Masaru Takahashi, Fumiaki Fusazaki, Tetsuya Tashiro, Atsushi Kin, Hajime Morino, Yoshihiro Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title | Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full | Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_fullStr | Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_short | Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_sort | safety and feasibility of retrograde inoue-balloon for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34110610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12928-021-00789-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ninomiyaryo safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT yoshizawamichiko safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT koedayorihiko safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT ishikawayu safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT kumagaiakiko safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT ishidamasaru safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT takahashifumiaki safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT fusazakitetsuya safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT tashiroatsushi safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT kinhajime safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT morinoyoshihiro safetyandfeasibilityofretrogradeinoueballoonforballoonaorticvalvuloplastywithoutrapidventricularpacingduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |