Cargando…

Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Molecular tumour boards (MTB) optimally match oncological therapies to patients with genetic aberrations. Prostate cancer (PCa) is underrepresented in these MTB discussions. This study describes the impact of routine genetic profiling and MTB referral on the outcome of PCa patients in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slootbeek, Peter H. J., Kloots, Iris S. H., Smits, Minke, van Oort, Inge M., Gerritsen, Winald R., Schalken, Jack A., Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L., Grünberg, Katrien, Kroeze, Leonie I., Bloemendal, Haiko J., Mehra, Niven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01663-9
_version_ 1784670425630900224
author Slootbeek, Peter H. J.
Kloots, Iris S. H.
Smits, Minke
van Oort, Inge M.
Gerritsen, Winald R.
Schalken, Jack A.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Grünberg, Katrien
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Bloemendal, Haiko J.
Mehra, Niven
author_facet Slootbeek, Peter H. J.
Kloots, Iris S. H.
Smits, Minke
van Oort, Inge M.
Gerritsen, Winald R.
Schalken, Jack A.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Grünberg, Katrien
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Bloemendal, Haiko J.
Mehra, Niven
author_sort Slootbeek, Peter H. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecular tumour boards (MTB) optimally match oncological therapies to patients with genetic aberrations. Prostate cancer (PCa) is underrepresented in these MTB discussions. This study describes the impact of routine genetic profiling and MTB referral on the outcome of PCa patients in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: All PCa patients that received next-generation sequencing results and/or were discussed at an MTB between Jan 1, 2017 and Jan 1, 2020 were included. Genetically matched therapies (GMT) in clinical trials or compassionate use were linked to actionable alterations. Response to these agents was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the 277 genetically profiled PCa patients, 215 (78%) were discussed in at least one MTB meeting. A GMT was recommended to 102 patients (47%), of which 63 patients (62%) initiated the GMT. The most recommended therapies were PARP inhibitors (n = 74), programmed death-(ligand) 1 inhibitors (n = 21) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 19). Once started, 41.3% had a PFS of ≥6 months, 43.5% a PSA decline ≥50% and 38.5% an objective radiographic response. CONCLUSION: Recommendation for a GMT is achieved in almost half of the patients with advanced prostate cancer, with GMT initiation leading to durable responses in over 40% of patients. These data justify routine referral of selected PCa patients to MTB’s.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8927341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89273412022-04-01 Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer Slootbeek, Peter H. J. Kloots, Iris S. H. Smits, Minke van Oort, Inge M. Gerritsen, Winald R. Schalken, Jack A. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. Grünberg, Katrien Kroeze, Leonie I. Bloemendal, Haiko J. Mehra, Niven Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Molecular tumour boards (MTB) optimally match oncological therapies to patients with genetic aberrations. Prostate cancer (PCa) is underrepresented in these MTB discussions. This study describes the impact of routine genetic profiling and MTB referral on the outcome of PCa patients in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: All PCa patients that received next-generation sequencing results and/or were discussed at an MTB between Jan 1, 2017 and Jan 1, 2020 were included. Genetically matched therapies (GMT) in clinical trials or compassionate use were linked to actionable alterations. Response to these agents was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the 277 genetically profiled PCa patients, 215 (78%) were discussed in at least one MTB meeting. A GMT was recommended to 102 patients (47%), of which 63 patients (62%) initiated the GMT. The most recommended therapies were PARP inhibitors (n = 74), programmed death-(ligand) 1 inhibitors (n = 21) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 19). Once started, 41.3% had a PFS of ≥6 months, 43.5% a PSA decline ≥50% and 38.5% an objective radiographic response. CONCLUSION: Recommendation for a GMT is achieved in almost half of the patients with advanced prostate cancer, with GMT initiation leading to durable responses in over 40% of patients. These data justify routine referral of selected PCa patients to MTB’s. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-15 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8927341/ /pubmed/34912074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01663-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Slootbeek, Peter H. J.
Kloots, Iris S. H.
Smits, Minke
van Oort, Inge M.
Gerritsen, Winald R.
Schalken, Jack A.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
Grünberg, Katrien
Kroeze, Leonie I.
Bloemendal, Haiko J.
Mehra, Niven
Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title_full Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title_fullStr Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title_short Impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
title_sort impact of molecular tumour board discussion on targeted therapy allocation in advanced prostate cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01663-9
work_keys_str_mv AT slootbeekpeterhj impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT klootsirissh impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT smitsminke impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT vanoortingem impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT gerritsenwinaldr impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT schalkenjacka impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT grunbergkatrien impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT kroezeleoniei impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT bloemendalhaikoj impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer
AT mehraniven impactofmoleculartumourboarddiscussionontargetedtherapyallocationinadvancedprostatecancer