Cargando…
In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment
INTRODUCTION: Pilocarpine hydrochloride (pilo) ophthalmic solution has traditionally been used for the treatment of glaucoma, with opportunities to improve the tolerability profile experienced by patients. Pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 1.25% (Vuity™, Allergan, an AbbVie company) was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35235173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00482-2 |
_version_ | 1784670463734054912 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Mitchell A. Giyanani, Jaya Shabaik, Yumna Penzner, Jeff Gore, Anuradha V. Robinson, Michael R. Waring, George O. |
author_facet | Jackson, Mitchell A. Giyanani, Jaya Shabaik, Yumna Penzner, Jeff Gore, Anuradha V. Robinson, Michael R. Waring, George O. |
author_sort | Jackson, Mitchell A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pilocarpine hydrochloride (pilo) ophthalmic solution has traditionally been used for the treatment of glaucoma, with opportunities to improve the tolerability profile experienced by patients. Pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 1.25% (Vuity™, Allergan, an AbbVie company) was approved in late 2021 for the treatment of adults with presbyopia. This publication describes the properties of the optimized, proprietary vehicle of this new ophthalmic solution developed with the aim of improving tolerability upon instillation. METHODS: An in vitro method determined the time required for the pH of pilo 1.25% in the proprietary vehicle (Optimized Formulation) and a commercially available 1% pilo ophthalmic solution (Generic Formulation) to equilibrate with the pH of simulated tear fluid (STF). In a pilot study, five of the six screened participants received one drop of the Optimized Formulation in one eye and Generic Formulation in the other. Ocular discomfort and vision blur were evaluated for each eye just prior to and at multiple times after drop instillation using visual analog scales (VAS), and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: The in vitro method showed that the Optimized Formulation achieved faster pH equilibration than the Generic Formulation. The pilot study revealed that the Optimized Formulation demonstrated less ocular discomfort, vision blur, and adverse events compared to the Generic. CONCLUSION: The in vitro and pilot study of the Optimized Formulation indicated that it rapidly equilibrates to the physiologic pH of the tear film, providing greater comfort and tolerability while also minimizing vision blur. Overall, the proprietary vehicle is expected to improve comfort, result in less vision blur, and provide a well-tolerated alternative method to deliver pilo for the treatment of presbyopia when compared to what is commercially available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8927535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89275352022-04-01 In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment Jackson, Mitchell A. Giyanani, Jaya Shabaik, Yumna Penzner, Jeff Gore, Anuradha V. Robinson, Michael R. Waring, George O. Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Pilocarpine hydrochloride (pilo) ophthalmic solution has traditionally been used for the treatment of glaucoma, with opportunities to improve the tolerability profile experienced by patients. Pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 1.25% (Vuity™, Allergan, an AbbVie company) was approved in late 2021 for the treatment of adults with presbyopia. This publication describes the properties of the optimized, proprietary vehicle of this new ophthalmic solution developed with the aim of improving tolerability upon instillation. METHODS: An in vitro method determined the time required for the pH of pilo 1.25% in the proprietary vehicle (Optimized Formulation) and a commercially available 1% pilo ophthalmic solution (Generic Formulation) to equilibrate with the pH of simulated tear fluid (STF). In a pilot study, five of the six screened participants received one drop of the Optimized Formulation in one eye and Generic Formulation in the other. Ocular discomfort and vision blur were evaluated for each eye just prior to and at multiple times after drop instillation using visual analog scales (VAS), and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: The in vitro method showed that the Optimized Formulation achieved faster pH equilibration than the Generic Formulation. The pilot study revealed that the Optimized Formulation demonstrated less ocular discomfort, vision blur, and adverse events compared to the Generic. CONCLUSION: The in vitro and pilot study of the Optimized Formulation indicated that it rapidly equilibrates to the physiologic pH of the tear film, providing greater comfort and tolerability while also minimizing vision blur. Overall, the proprietary vehicle is expected to improve comfort, result in less vision blur, and provide a well-tolerated alternative method to deliver pilo for the treatment of presbyopia when compared to what is commercially available. Springer Healthcare 2022-03-02 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8927535/ /pubmed/35235173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00482-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jackson, Mitchell A. Giyanani, Jaya Shabaik, Yumna Penzner, Jeff Gore, Anuradha V. Robinson, Michael R. Waring, George O. In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title | In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title_full | In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title_fullStr | In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title_short | In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment |
title_sort | in vitro and in-eye comparison of commercial pilocarpine ophthalmic solution and an optimized, reformulated pilocarpine for presbyopia treatment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35235173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00482-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksonmitchella invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT giyananijaya invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT shabaikyumna invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT penznerjeff invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT goreanuradhav invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT robinsonmichaelr invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment AT waringgeorgeo invitroandineyecomparisonofcommercialpilocarpineophthalmicsolutionandanoptimizedreformulatedpilocarpineforpresbyopiatreatment |