Cargando…

Balance strategy in hoverboard control

This study examines how people learn to perform lower limb control in a novel task with a hoverboard requiring to maintain dynamic balance. We designed an experiment to investigate the learning of hoverboard balance and two control strategies: A hip strategy, which mainly uses hip movements to chang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shushtari, Mohammad, Takagi, Atsushi, Lee, Judy, Burdet, Etienne, Arami, Arash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08291-0
_version_ 1784670474641342464
author Shushtari, Mohammad
Takagi, Atsushi
Lee, Judy
Burdet, Etienne
Arami, Arash
author_facet Shushtari, Mohammad
Takagi, Atsushi
Lee, Judy
Burdet, Etienne
Arami, Arash
author_sort Shushtari, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description This study examines how people learn to perform lower limb control in a novel task with a hoverboard requiring to maintain dynamic balance. We designed an experiment to investigate the learning of hoverboard balance and two control strategies: A hip strategy, which mainly uses hip movements to change the angle of the foot, and an ankle strategy relying more on ankle motion to control the orientation of hoverboard plates controlling the motion. Motor learning was indicated by a significant [Formula: see text] % decrease in the trial completion time (p < 0.001) and a significant 24 ± 11% decrease in total muscle activation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the participants, who had no prior experience riding a hoverboard, learned an ankle strategy to maintain their balance and control the hoverboard. This is supported by significantly stronger cross-correlation, phase synchrony, lower dynamic time warping distance between the hoverboard plate orientation controlling hoverboard motion, and the ankle angle when compared to the hip angle. The adopted ankle strategy was found to be robust to the foot orientation despite salient changes in muscle group activation patterns. Comparison with results of an experienced hoverboard rider confirmed that the first-time riders adopted an ankle strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8927589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89275892022-03-21 Balance strategy in hoverboard control Shushtari, Mohammad Takagi, Atsushi Lee, Judy Burdet, Etienne Arami, Arash Sci Rep Article This study examines how people learn to perform lower limb control in a novel task with a hoverboard requiring to maintain dynamic balance. We designed an experiment to investigate the learning of hoverboard balance and two control strategies: A hip strategy, which mainly uses hip movements to change the angle of the foot, and an ankle strategy relying more on ankle motion to control the orientation of hoverboard plates controlling the motion. Motor learning was indicated by a significant [Formula: see text] % decrease in the trial completion time (p < 0.001) and a significant 24 ± 11% decrease in total muscle activation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the participants, who had no prior experience riding a hoverboard, learned an ankle strategy to maintain their balance and control the hoverboard. This is supported by significantly stronger cross-correlation, phase synchrony, lower dynamic time warping distance between the hoverboard plate orientation controlling hoverboard motion, and the ankle angle when compared to the hip angle. The adopted ankle strategy was found to be robust to the foot orientation despite salient changes in muscle group activation patterns. Comparison with results of an experienced hoverboard rider confirmed that the first-time riders adopted an ankle strategy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8927589/ /pubmed/35296707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08291-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shushtari, Mohammad
Takagi, Atsushi
Lee, Judy
Burdet, Etienne
Arami, Arash
Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title_full Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title_fullStr Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title_full_unstemmed Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title_short Balance strategy in hoverboard control
title_sort balance strategy in hoverboard control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08291-0
work_keys_str_mv AT shushtarimohammad balancestrategyinhoverboardcontrol
AT takagiatsushi balancestrategyinhoverboardcontrol
AT leejudy balancestrategyinhoverboardcontrol
AT burdetetienne balancestrategyinhoverboardcontrol
AT aramiarash balancestrategyinhoverboardcontrol