Cargando…

Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies

Climate change calls for adaptation of negative emission technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) to lower the global warming impacts of greenhouse gases. Recently, elevated global interests to the DAC technologies prompted implementation of new tax credits and new pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozkan, Mihrimah, Nayak, Saswat Priyadarshi, Ruiz, Anthony D., Jiang, Wenmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103990
_version_ 1784670545727455232
author Ozkan, Mihrimah
Nayak, Saswat Priyadarshi
Ruiz, Anthony D.
Jiang, Wenmei
author_facet Ozkan, Mihrimah
Nayak, Saswat Priyadarshi
Ruiz, Anthony D.
Jiang, Wenmei
author_sort Ozkan, Mihrimah
collection PubMed
description Climate change calls for adaptation of negative emission technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) to lower the global warming impacts of greenhouse gases. Recently, elevated global interests to the DAC technologies prompted implementation of new tax credits and new policies worldwide that motivated the existing DAC companies and prompted the startup boom. There are presently 19 DAC plants operating worldwide, capturing more than 0.01 Mt CO(2)/year. DAC active plants capturing in average 10,000 tons of CO(2) annually are still in their infancy and are expensive. DAC technologies still need to improve in three areas: 1) Contactor, 2) Sorbent, and 3) Regeneration to drive down the costs. Technology-based economic development in all three areas are required to achieve <$100/ton of CO(2) which makes DAC economically viable. Current DAC cost is about 2–6 times higher than the desired cost and depends highly on the source of energy used. In this review, we present the current status of commercial DAC technologies and elucidate the five pillars of technology including capture technologies, their energy demand, final costs, environmental impacts, and political support. We explain processing steps for liquid and solid carbon capture technologies and indicate their specific energy requirements. DAC capital and operational cost based on plant power energy sources, land and water needs of DAC are discussed in detail. At 0.01 Mt CO(2)/year capture capacity, DAC alone faces a challenge to meet the rates of carbon capture described in the goals of the Paris Agreement with 1.5–2°C of global warming. However, DAC may partially help to offset difficult to avoid annual emissions from concrete (∼8%), transportation (∼24%), iron-steel industry (∼11%), and wildfires (∼0.8%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8927912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89279122022-03-18 Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies Ozkan, Mihrimah Nayak, Saswat Priyadarshi Ruiz, Anthony D. Jiang, Wenmei iScience Review Climate change calls for adaptation of negative emission technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) to lower the global warming impacts of greenhouse gases. Recently, elevated global interests to the DAC technologies prompted implementation of new tax credits and new policies worldwide that motivated the existing DAC companies and prompted the startup boom. There are presently 19 DAC plants operating worldwide, capturing more than 0.01 Mt CO(2)/year. DAC active plants capturing in average 10,000 tons of CO(2) annually are still in their infancy and are expensive. DAC technologies still need to improve in three areas: 1) Contactor, 2) Sorbent, and 3) Regeneration to drive down the costs. Technology-based economic development in all three areas are required to achieve <$100/ton of CO(2) which makes DAC economically viable. Current DAC cost is about 2–6 times higher than the desired cost and depends highly on the source of energy used. In this review, we present the current status of commercial DAC technologies and elucidate the five pillars of technology including capture technologies, their energy demand, final costs, environmental impacts, and political support. We explain processing steps for liquid and solid carbon capture technologies and indicate their specific energy requirements. DAC capital and operational cost based on plant power energy sources, land and water needs of DAC are discussed in detail. At 0.01 Mt CO(2)/year capture capacity, DAC alone faces a challenge to meet the rates of carbon capture described in the goals of the Paris Agreement with 1.5–2°C of global warming. However, DAC may partially help to offset difficult to avoid annual emissions from concrete (∼8%), transportation (∼24%), iron-steel industry (∼11%), and wildfires (∼0.8%). Elsevier 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8927912/ /pubmed/35310937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103990 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ozkan, Mihrimah
Nayak, Saswat Priyadarshi
Ruiz, Anthony D.
Jiang, Wenmei
Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title_full Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title_fullStr Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title_full_unstemmed Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title_short Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
title_sort current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8927912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103990
work_keys_str_mv AT ozkanmihrimah currentstatusandpillarsofdirectaircapturetechnologies
AT nayaksaswatpriyadarshi currentstatusandpillarsofdirectaircapturetechnologies
AT ruizanthonyd currentstatusandpillarsofdirectaircapturetechnologies
AT jiangwenmei currentstatusandpillarsofdirectaircapturetechnologies