Cargando…

The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results

BACKGROUND: Since sequencing techniques have become less expensive, larger sample sizes are applicable for microbiota studies. The aim of this study is to show how, and to what extent, different diversity metrics and different compositions of the microbiota influence the needed sample size to observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kers, Jannigje Gerdien, Saccenti, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025
_version_ 1784670589631332352
author Kers, Jannigje Gerdien
Saccenti, Edoardo
author_facet Kers, Jannigje Gerdien
Saccenti, Edoardo
author_sort Kers, Jannigje Gerdien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since sequencing techniques have become less expensive, larger sample sizes are applicable for microbiota studies. The aim of this study is to show how, and to what extent, different diversity metrics and different compositions of the microbiota influence the needed sample size to observe dissimilar groups. Empirical 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data obtained from animal experiments, observational human data, and simulated data were used to perform retrospective power calculations. A wide variation of alpha diversity and beta diversity metrics were used to compare the different microbiota datasets and the effect on the sample size. RESULTS: Our data showed that beta diversity metrics are the most sensitive to observe differences as compared with alpha diversity metrics. The structure of the data influenced which alpha metrics are the most sensitive. Regarding beta diversity, the Bray–Curtis metric is in general the most sensitive to observe differences between groups, resulting in lower sample size and potential publication bias. CONCLUSION: We recommend performing power calculations and to use multiple diversity metrics as an outcome measure. To improve microbiota studies, awareness needs to be raised on the sensitivity and bias for microbiota research outcomes created by the used metrics rather than biological differences. We have seen that different alpha and beta diversity metrics lead to different study power: because of this, one could be naturally tempted to try all possible metrics until one or more are found that give a statistically significant test result, i.e., p-value < α. This way of proceeding is one of the many forms of the so-called p-value hacking. To this end, in our opinion, the only way to protect ourselves from (the temptation of) p-hacking would be to publish a statistical plan before experiments are initiated, describing the outcomes of interest and the corresponding statistical analyses to be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89281472022-03-18 The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results Kers, Jannigje Gerdien Saccenti, Edoardo Front Microbiol Microbiology BACKGROUND: Since sequencing techniques have become less expensive, larger sample sizes are applicable for microbiota studies. The aim of this study is to show how, and to what extent, different diversity metrics and different compositions of the microbiota influence the needed sample size to observe dissimilar groups. Empirical 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data obtained from animal experiments, observational human data, and simulated data were used to perform retrospective power calculations. A wide variation of alpha diversity and beta diversity metrics were used to compare the different microbiota datasets and the effect on the sample size. RESULTS: Our data showed that beta diversity metrics are the most sensitive to observe differences as compared with alpha diversity metrics. The structure of the data influenced which alpha metrics are the most sensitive. Regarding beta diversity, the Bray–Curtis metric is in general the most sensitive to observe differences between groups, resulting in lower sample size and potential publication bias. CONCLUSION: We recommend performing power calculations and to use multiple diversity metrics as an outcome measure. To improve microbiota studies, awareness needs to be raised on the sensitivity and bias for microbiota research outcomes created by the used metrics rather than biological differences. We have seen that different alpha and beta diversity metrics lead to different study power: because of this, one could be naturally tempted to try all possible metrics until one or more are found that give a statistically significant test result, i.e., p-value < α. This way of proceeding is one of the many forms of the so-called p-value hacking. To this end, in our opinion, the only way to protect ourselves from (the temptation of) p-hacking would be to publish a statistical plan before experiments are initiated, describing the outcomes of interest and the corresponding statistical analyses to be performed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8928147/ /pubmed/35310396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kers and Saccenti. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Kers, Jannigje Gerdien
Saccenti, Edoardo
The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title_full The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title_fullStr The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title_full_unstemmed The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title_short The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results
title_sort power of microbiome studies: some considerations on which alpha and beta metrics to use and how to report results
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025
work_keys_str_mv AT kersjannigjegerdien thepowerofmicrobiomestudiessomeconsiderationsonwhichalphaandbetametricstouseandhowtoreportresults
AT saccentiedoardo thepowerofmicrobiomestudiessomeconsiderationsonwhichalphaandbetametricstouseandhowtoreportresults
AT kersjannigjegerdien powerofmicrobiomestudiessomeconsiderationsonwhichalphaandbetametricstouseandhowtoreportresults
AT saccentiedoardo powerofmicrobiomestudiessomeconsiderationsonwhichalphaandbetametricstouseandhowtoreportresults