Cargando…

RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory

OBJECTIVES: This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation. SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radford, Kathryn A, McKevitt, Christopher, Clarke, Sara, Powers, Katie, Phillips, Julie, Craven, Kristelle, Watkins, Caroline, Farrin, Amanda, Holmes, Jain, Cripps, Rachel, McLellan, Vicki, Sach, Tracey, Brindle, Richard, Holloway, Ivana, Hartley, Suzanne, Bowen, Audrey, O'Connor, Rory J, Stevens, Judith, Walker, Marion, Murray, John, Shone, Angela, Clarke, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111
_version_ 1784670604505382912
author Radford, Kathryn A
McKevitt, Christopher
Clarke, Sara
Powers, Katie
Phillips, Julie
Craven, Kristelle
Watkins, Caroline
Farrin, Amanda
Holmes, Jain
Cripps, Rachel
McLellan, Vicki
Sach, Tracey
Brindle, Richard
Holloway, Ivana
Hartley, Suzanne
Bowen, Audrey
O'Connor, Rory J
Stevens, Judith
Walker, Marion
Murray, John
Shone, Angela
Clarke, David
author_facet Radford, Kathryn A
McKevitt, Christopher
Clarke, Sara
Powers, Katie
Phillips, Julie
Craven, Kristelle
Watkins, Caroline
Farrin, Amanda
Holmes, Jain
Cripps, Rachel
McLellan, Vicki
Sach, Tracey
Brindle, Richard
Holloway, Ivana
Hartley, Suzanne
Bowen, Audrey
O'Connor, Rory J
Stevens, Judith
Walker, Marion
Murray, John
Shone, Angela
Clarke, David
author_sort Radford, Kathryn A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation. SETTING: RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval obtained through the East Midlands—Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12464275.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89282582022-04-01 RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory Radford, Kathryn A McKevitt, Christopher Clarke, Sara Powers, Katie Phillips, Julie Craven, Kristelle Watkins, Caroline Farrin, Amanda Holmes, Jain Cripps, Rachel McLellan, Vicki Sach, Tracey Brindle, Richard Holloway, Ivana Hartley, Suzanne Bowen, Audrey O'Connor, Rory J Stevens, Judith Walker, Marion Murray, John Shone, Angela Clarke, David BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation. SETTING: RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval obtained through the East Midlands—Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12464275. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8928258/ /pubmed/35292493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Radford, Kathryn A
McKevitt, Christopher
Clarke, Sara
Powers, Katie
Phillips, Julie
Craven, Kristelle
Watkins, Caroline
Farrin, Amanda
Holmes, Jain
Cripps, Rachel
McLellan, Vicki
Sach, Tracey
Brindle, Richard
Holloway, Ivana
Hartley, Suzanne
Bowen, Audrey
O'Connor, Rory J
Stevens, Judith
Walker, Marion
Murray, John
Shone, Angela
Clarke, David
RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title_full RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title_fullStr RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title_full_unstemmed RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title_short RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
title_sort return to work after stroke (retake) trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35292493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111
work_keys_str_mv AT radfordkathryna returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT mckevittchristopher returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT clarkesara returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT powerskatie returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT phillipsjulie returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT cravenkristelle returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT watkinscaroline returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT farrinamanda returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT holmesjain returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT crippsrachel returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT mclellanvicki returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT sachtracey returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT brindlerichard returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT hollowayivana returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT hartleysuzanne returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT bowenaudrey returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT oconnorroryj returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT stevensjudith returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT walkermarion returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT murrayjohn returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT shoneangela returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT clarkedavid returntoworkafterstrokeretaketrialprotocolforamixedmethodsprocessevaluationusingnormalisationprocesstheory