Cargando…

Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Both knotted and knotless single-anchor repair techniques are used to repair transmural ruptures of the upper subscapularis (SSC) tendon. However, it is still unclear which technique provides better clinical and radiological results. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the clinical and magnet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sgroi, Mirco, Kranz, , Marilena, Seitz, Andreas Martin, Ludwig, Marius, Faschingbauer, Martin, Zippelius, Timo, Reichel, Heiko, Kappe, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35309232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221083591
_version_ 1784670632677474304
author Sgroi, Mirco
Kranz, , Marilena
Seitz, Andreas Martin
Ludwig, Marius
Faschingbauer, Martin
Zippelius, Timo
Reichel, Heiko
Kappe, Thomas
author_facet Sgroi, Mirco
Kranz, , Marilena
Seitz, Andreas Martin
Ludwig, Marius
Faschingbauer, Martin
Zippelius, Timo
Reichel, Heiko
Kappe, Thomas
author_sort Sgroi, Mirco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both knotted and knotless single-anchor repair techniques are used to repair transmural ruptures of the upper subscapularis (SSC) tendon. However, it is still unclear which technique provides better clinical and radiological results. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of knotless and knotted single-anchor repair techniques in patients with a transmural rupture of the upper SSC tendon at 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that the 2 techniques would not differ significantly in outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Forty patients with a transmural tear of the upper SSC tendon (grade 2 or 3 according to Fox and Romeo) were retrospectively enrolled. Depending on the repair technique, patients were assigned to either the knotless single-anchor or knotted single-anchor group. After a mean follow-up of 2.33 ± 0.43 years, patients were assessed by the ASES, WORC, OSS, CS, and SSV. A clinical examination that included the bear-hug, the lift-off, and the belly-press tests was performed, in which the force exerted by the subjects was measured. In addition, all patients underwent MRI of the affected shoulder to assess repair integrity, tendon width, fatty infiltration, signal-to-signal ratio of the upper and lower SSC muscle, and atrophy of the SSC muscle. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the 2 groups on any of the clinical scores [ASES (P = .272), WORC (P = .523), OSS (P = .401), CS (P = .328), SSV (P = .540)] or on the range-of-motion or force measurements. Apart from a higher signal-to-signal ratio of the lower SSC muscle in the knotless group (P = .017), no significant difference on imaging outcomes was found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Both techniques can be used in surgical practice, as neither was found to be superior to the other in terms of clinical or imaging outcomes at 2-year follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89283932022-03-18 Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up Sgroi, Mirco Kranz, , Marilena Seitz, Andreas Martin Ludwig, Marius Faschingbauer, Martin Zippelius, Timo Reichel, Heiko Kappe, Thomas Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Both knotted and knotless single-anchor repair techniques are used to repair transmural ruptures of the upper subscapularis (SSC) tendon. However, it is still unclear which technique provides better clinical and radiological results. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of knotless and knotted single-anchor repair techniques in patients with a transmural rupture of the upper SSC tendon at 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that the 2 techniques would not differ significantly in outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Forty patients with a transmural tear of the upper SSC tendon (grade 2 or 3 according to Fox and Romeo) were retrospectively enrolled. Depending on the repair technique, patients were assigned to either the knotless single-anchor or knotted single-anchor group. After a mean follow-up of 2.33 ± 0.43 years, patients were assessed by the ASES, WORC, OSS, CS, and SSV. A clinical examination that included the bear-hug, the lift-off, and the belly-press tests was performed, in which the force exerted by the subjects was measured. In addition, all patients underwent MRI of the affected shoulder to assess repair integrity, tendon width, fatty infiltration, signal-to-signal ratio of the upper and lower SSC muscle, and atrophy of the SSC muscle. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the 2 groups on any of the clinical scores [ASES (P = .272), WORC (P = .523), OSS (P = .401), CS (P = .328), SSV (P = .540)] or on the range-of-motion or force measurements. Apart from a higher signal-to-signal ratio of the lower SSC muscle in the knotless group (P = .017), no significant difference on imaging outcomes was found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Both techniques can be used in surgical practice, as neither was found to be superior to the other in terms of clinical or imaging outcomes at 2-year follow-up. SAGE Publications 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8928393/ /pubmed/35309232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221083591 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Sgroi, Mirco
Kranz, , Marilena
Seitz, Andreas Martin
Ludwig, Marius
Faschingbauer, Martin
Zippelius, Timo
Reichel, Heiko
Kappe, Thomas
Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title_full Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title_short Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
title_sort comparison of knotless and knotted single-anchor repair for ruptures of the upper subscapularis tendon: outcomes at 2-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35309232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221083591
work_keys_str_mv AT sgroimirco comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT kranzmarilena comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT seitzandreasmartin comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT ludwigmarius comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT faschingbauermartin comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT zippeliustimo comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT reichelheiko comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup
AT kappethomas comparisonofknotlessandknottedsingleanchorrepairforrupturesoftheuppersubscapularistendonoutcomesat2yearfollowup