Cargando…
Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998 |
_version_ | 1784670634613145600 |
---|---|
author | Binvignat, Marie Pedoia, Valentina Butte, Atul J Louati, Karine Klatzmann, David Berenbaum, Francis Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita Sellam, Jérémie |
author_facet | Binvignat, Marie Pedoia, Valentina Butte, Atul J Louati, Karine Klatzmann, David Berenbaum, Francis Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita Sellam, Jérémie |
author_sort | Binvignat, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected. RESULTS: From 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles. CONCLUSION: This review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8928401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89284012022-04-01 Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review Binvignat, Marie Pedoia, Valentina Butte, Atul J Louati, Karine Klatzmann, David Berenbaum, Francis Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita Sellam, Jérémie RMD Open Osteoarthritis OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected. RESULTS: From 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles. CONCLUSION: This review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8928401/ /pubmed/35296530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Osteoarthritis Binvignat, Marie Pedoia, Valentina Butte, Atul J Louati, Karine Klatzmann, David Berenbaum, Francis Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita Sellam, Jérémie Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title | Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title_full | Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title_short | Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review |
topic | Osteoarthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binvignatmarie useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT pedoiavalentina useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT butteatulj useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT louatikarine useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT klatzmanndavid useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT berenbaumfrancis useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT mariottiferrandizencarnita useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview AT sellamjeremie useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview |