Cargando…

Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binvignat, Marie, Pedoia, Valentina, Butte, Atul J, Louati, Karine, Klatzmann, David, Berenbaum, Francis, Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita, Sellam, Jérémie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998
_version_ 1784670634613145600
author Binvignat, Marie
Pedoia, Valentina
Butte, Atul J
Louati, Karine
Klatzmann, David
Berenbaum, Francis
Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita
Sellam, Jérémie
author_facet Binvignat, Marie
Pedoia, Valentina
Butte, Atul J
Louati, Karine
Klatzmann, David
Berenbaum, Francis
Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita
Sellam, Jérémie
author_sort Binvignat, Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected. RESULTS: From 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles. CONCLUSION: This review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89284012022-04-01 Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review Binvignat, Marie Pedoia, Valentina Butte, Atul J Louati, Karine Klatzmann, David Berenbaum, Francis Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita Sellam, Jérémie RMD Open Osteoarthritis OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected. RESULTS: From 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles. CONCLUSION: This review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8928401/ /pubmed/35296530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Osteoarthritis
Binvignat, Marie
Pedoia, Valentina
Butte, Atul J
Louati, Karine
Klatzmann, David
Berenbaum, Francis
Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Encarnita
Sellam, Jérémie
Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title_full Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title_short Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
title_sort use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review
topic Osteoarthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001998
work_keys_str_mv AT binvignatmarie useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT pedoiavalentina useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT butteatulj useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT louatikarine useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT klatzmanndavid useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT berenbaumfrancis useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT mariottiferrandizencarnita useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview
AT sellamjeremie useofmachinelearninginosteoarthritisresearchasystematicliteraturereview