Cargando…

It’s time for a minimum synoptic operation template in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Despite the call to enhance accuracy and value of operation records few international recommended minimal standards for operative notes documentation have been described. This study undertook a systematic review of existing operative reporting systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Niall, Sugrue, Michael, Melly, Conor, McGeehan, Gearoid, Bucholc, Magda, Crawford, Aileen, O’Connor, Paul, Abu-Zidan, Fikri, Wani, Imtiaz, Balogh, Zsolt J., Shelat, Vishal G., Tebala, Giovanni D., De Simone, Belinda, Eid, Hani O., Chirica, Mircea, Fraga, Gustavo P., Di Saverio, Salomone, Picetti, Edoardo, Bonavina, Luigi, Ceresoli, Marco, Fette, Andreas, Sakakushe, Boris, Pikoulis, Emmanouil, Coimbra, Raul, ten Broek, Richard, Hecker, Andreas, Leppäniemi, Ari, Litvin, Andrey, Stahel, Philip, Tan, Edward, Koike, Kaoru, Catena, Fausto, Pisano, Michele, Coccolini, Federico, Johnston, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite the call to enhance accuracy and value of operation records few international recommended minimal standards for operative notes documentation have been described. This study undertook a systematic review of existing operative reporting systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to fashion a comprehensive, synoptic operative reporting template for the future. METHODS: A search for all relevant articles was conducted using PubMed version of Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases in June 2021, for publications from January 1st 2011 to October 25th 2021, using the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR proforma OR documentation OR report OR narrative OR audio-visual OR synoptic OR digital. Two reviewers (NOC, GMC) independently assessed each published study using a MINORS score of ≥ 16 for comparative and ≥ 10 for non-comparative for inclusion. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Synoptic operative templates from published data were assimilated into one “ideal” laparoscopic operative report template following international input from the World Society of Emergency Surgery board. RESULTS: A total of 3567 articles were reviewed. Following MINORS grading 25 studies were selected spanning 14 countries and 4 continents. Twenty-two studies were prospective. A holistic overview of the operative procedure documentation was reported in 6/25 studies and a further 19 papers dealt with selective surgical aspects of LC. A unique synoptic LC operative reporting template was developed and translated into Chinese/Mandarin, French and Arabic. CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified a paucity of publications dealing with operative reporting of LC. The proposed new template may be integrated digitally with hospitals’ medical systems and include additional narrative text and audio-visual data. The template may help define new OR (operating room) recording standards and impact on care for patients undergoing LC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5.