Cargando…

Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation

BACKGROUND: Performance of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may affect patients, self-efficacy to complete physical activity tasks. First evidence from a diagnostic before-after study indicates a significant increase of patient-reported functional ability. Our study set out to test the reproduci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schindl, Martin, Zipko, Harald, Bethge, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w
_version_ 1784670686559600640
author Schindl, Martin
Zipko, Harald
Bethge, Matthias
author_facet Schindl, Martin
Zipko, Harald
Bethge, Matthias
author_sort Schindl, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Performance of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may affect patients, self-efficacy to complete physical activity tasks. First evidence from a diagnostic before-after study indicates a significant increase of patient-reported functional ability. Our study set out to test the reproducibility of these results. METHODS: Patients with musculoskeletal trauma and an unclear return to work prognosis were recruited in a trauma rehabilitation center in Lower Austria. We included patient cohorts of three consecutive years (2016: n = 161, 2017: n = 140; 2018: n = 151). Our primary outcome was patient-reported functional ability, measured using the Spinal Function Sort (SFS). SFS scores were assessed before and after performing an FCE to describe the change in patient-reported functional ability (cohort study). We investigated whether the change in SFS scores observed after performing an FCE in our first cohort could be replicated in subsequent cohorts. RESULTS: Demographic data (gender, age and time after trauma) did not differ significantly between the three patient cohorts. Correlation analysis showed highly associated before and after SFS scores in each cohort (2016: r(s) = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.89; 2017: r(s) = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; 2018: r(s) = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.91). Improvements in SFS scores were consistent across the cohorts, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (2016: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.3 to 18.2; 2017: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.5 to 18.0; 2018: 15.2, 95% CI: 12.0 to 18.4). Similarity in SFS scores and SFS differences were also supported by non-significant Kruskal–Wallis H tests (before FCE: p = 0.517; after FCE: p = 0.531; SFS differences: p = 0.931). CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in patient-reported functional ability after FCE was found in the original study and the results could be reproduced in two subsequent cohorts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89286522022-03-23 Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation Schindl, Martin Zipko, Harald Bethge, Matthias BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Performance of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may affect patients, self-efficacy to complete physical activity tasks. First evidence from a diagnostic before-after study indicates a significant increase of patient-reported functional ability. Our study set out to test the reproducibility of these results. METHODS: Patients with musculoskeletal trauma and an unclear return to work prognosis were recruited in a trauma rehabilitation center in Lower Austria. We included patient cohorts of three consecutive years (2016: n = 161, 2017: n = 140; 2018: n = 151). Our primary outcome was patient-reported functional ability, measured using the Spinal Function Sort (SFS). SFS scores were assessed before and after performing an FCE to describe the change in patient-reported functional ability (cohort study). We investigated whether the change in SFS scores observed after performing an FCE in our first cohort could be replicated in subsequent cohorts. RESULTS: Demographic data (gender, age and time after trauma) did not differ significantly between the three patient cohorts. Correlation analysis showed highly associated before and after SFS scores in each cohort (2016: r(s) = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.89; 2017: r(s) = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; 2018: r(s) = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.91). Improvements in SFS scores were consistent across the cohorts, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (2016: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.3 to 18.2; 2017: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.5 to 18.0; 2018: 15.2, 95% CI: 12.0 to 18.4). Similarity in SFS scores and SFS differences were also supported by non-significant Kruskal–Wallis H tests (before FCE: p = 0.517; after FCE: p = 0.531; SFS differences: p = 0.931). CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in patient-reported functional ability after FCE was found in the original study and the results could be reproduced in two subsequent cohorts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w. BioMed Central 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8928652/ /pubmed/35296299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schindl, Martin
Zipko, Harald
Bethge, Matthias
Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title_full Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title_fullStr Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title_short Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
title_sort reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schindlmartin reproducibilityofimprovementsinpatientreportedfunctionalabilityfollowingfunctionalcapacityevaluation
AT zipkoharald reproducibilityofimprovementsinpatientreportedfunctionalabilityfollowingfunctionalcapacityevaluation
AT bethgematthias reproducibilityofimprovementsinpatientreportedfunctionalabilityfollowingfunctionalcapacityevaluation