Cargando…
“Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9 |
_version_ | 1784670691735371776 |
---|---|
author | Potthoff, Sarah Gather, Jakov Hempeler, Christin Gieselmann, Astrid Scholten, Matthé |
author_facet | Potthoff, Sarah Gather, Jakov Hempeler, Christin Gieselmann, Astrid Scholten, Matthé |
author_sort | Potthoff, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercion or treatment pressure. Empirical studies indicated that psychological pressure is common in mental healthcare services. No generally accepted definition of psychological pressure is available to date. A first conceptual analysis of psychological pressure focused on staff communication to promote treatment adherence and distinguished between persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements and threats. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of psychological pressure based on the perspectives of service users. METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The sample consisted of 14 mental health service users with a self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and prior experience with coercion in mental healthcare. We used theoretical sampling and contacted participants via mental healthcare services and self-help groups to ensure a variety of attitudes toward the mental healthcare system in the sample. The study was conducted in Germany from October 2019 to January 2020. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: The study indicated that psychological pressure is used not only to improve service users’ adherence to recommended treatment but also to improve their adherence to social rules; that it is exerted not only by mental health professionals but also by relatives and friends; and that the extent to which service users perceive communication as involving psychological pressure depends strongly on contextual factors. Relevant contextual factors were the way of communicating, the quality of the personal relationship, the institutional setting, the material surroundings and the level of convergence between the parties’ understanding of mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight the importance of staff communication training and organizational changes for reducing the use of psychological pressure in mental healthcare services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8928679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89286792022-03-23 “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users Potthoff, Sarah Gather, Jakov Hempeler, Christin Gieselmann, Astrid Scholten, Matthé BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercion or treatment pressure. Empirical studies indicated that psychological pressure is common in mental healthcare services. No generally accepted definition of psychological pressure is available to date. A first conceptual analysis of psychological pressure focused on staff communication to promote treatment adherence and distinguished between persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements and threats. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of psychological pressure based on the perspectives of service users. METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The sample consisted of 14 mental health service users with a self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and prior experience with coercion in mental healthcare. We used theoretical sampling and contacted participants via mental healthcare services and self-help groups to ensure a variety of attitudes toward the mental healthcare system in the sample. The study was conducted in Germany from October 2019 to January 2020. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: The study indicated that psychological pressure is used not only to improve service users’ adherence to recommended treatment but also to improve their adherence to social rules; that it is exerted not only by mental health professionals but also by relatives and friends; and that the extent to which service users perceive communication as involving psychological pressure depends strongly on contextual factors. Relevant contextual factors were the way of communicating, the quality of the personal relationship, the institutional setting, the material surroundings and the level of convergence between the parties’ understanding of mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight the importance of staff communication training and organizational changes for reducing the use of psychological pressure in mental healthcare services. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8928679/ /pubmed/35296288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Potthoff, Sarah Gather, Jakov Hempeler, Christin Gieselmann, Astrid Scholten, Matthé “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title | “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title_full | “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title_fullStr | “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title_full_unstemmed | “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title_short | “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
title_sort | “voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT potthoffsarah voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers AT gatherjakov voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers AT hempelerchristin voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers AT gieselmannastrid voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers AT scholtenmatthe voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers |