Cargando…

“Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users

BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potthoff, Sarah, Gather, Jakov, Hempeler, Christin, Gieselmann, Astrid, Scholten, Matthé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9
_version_ 1784670691735371776
author Potthoff, Sarah
Gather, Jakov
Hempeler, Christin
Gieselmann, Astrid
Scholten, Matthé
author_facet Potthoff, Sarah
Gather, Jakov
Hempeler, Christin
Gieselmann, Astrid
Scholten, Matthé
author_sort Potthoff, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercion or treatment pressure. Empirical studies indicated that psychological pressure is common in mental healthcare services. No generally accepted definition of psychological pressure is available to date. A first conceptual analysis of psychological pressure focused on staff communication to promote treatment adherence and distinguished between persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements and threats. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of psychological pressure based on the perspectives of service users. METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The sample consisted of 14 mental health service users with a self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and prior experience with coercion in mental healthcare. We used theoretical sampling and contacted participants via mental healthcare services and self-help groups to ensure a variety of attitudes toward the mental healthcare system in the sample. The study was conducted in Germany from October 2019 to January 2020. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: The study indicated that psychological pressure is used not only to improve service users’ adherence to recommended treatment but also to improve their adherence to social rules; that it is exerted not only by mental health professionals but also by relatives and friends; and that the extent to which service users perceive communication as involving psychological pressure depends strongly on contextual factors. Relevant contextual factors were the way of communicating, the quality of the personal relationship, the institutional setting, the material surroundings and the level of convergence between the parties’ understanding of mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight the importance of staff communication training and organizational changes for reducing the use of psychological pressure in mental healthcare services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8928679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89286792022-03-23 “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users Potthoff, Sarah Gather, Jakov Hempeler, Christin Gieselmann, Astrid Scholten, Matthé BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Psychological pressure refers to communicative strategies used by professionals and informal caregivers to influence the decision-making of service users and improve their adherence to recommended treatment or social rules. This phenomenon is also commonly referred to as informal coercion or treatment pressure. Empirical studies indicated that psychological pressure is common in mental healthcare services. No generally accepted definition of psychological pressure is available to date. A first conceptual analysis of psychological pressure focused on staff communication to promote treatment adherence and distinguished between persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements and threats. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of psychological pressure based on the perspectives of service users. METHODS: Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The sample consisted of 14 mental health service users with a self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and prior experience with coercion in mental healthcare. We used theoretical sampling and contacted participants via mental healthcare services and self-help groups to ensure a variety of attitudes toward the mental healthcare system in the sample. The study was conducted in Germany from October 2019 to January 2020. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: The study indicated that psychological pressure is used not only to improve service users’ adherence to recommended treatment but also to improve their adherence to social rules; that it is exerted not only by mental health professionals but also by relatives and friends; and that the extent to which service users perceive communication as involving psychological pressure depends strongly on contextual factors. Relevant contextual factors were the way of communicating, the quality of the personal relationship, the institutional setting, the material surroundings and the level of convergence between the parties’ understanding of mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study highlight the importance of staff communication training and organizational changes for reducing the use of psychological pressure in mental healthcare services. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8928679/ /pubmed/35296288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Potthoff, Sarah
Gather, Jakov
Hempeler, Christin
Gieselmann, Astrid
Scholten, Matthé
“Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title_full “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title_fullStr “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title_full_unstemmed “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title_short “Voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
title_sort “voluntary in quotation marks”: a conceptual model of psychological pressure in mental healthcare based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with service users
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03810-9
work_keys_str_mv AT potthoffsarah voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers
AT gatherjakov voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers
AT hempelerchristin voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers
AT gieselmannastrid voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers
AT scholtenmatthe voluntaryinquotationmarksaconceptualmodelofpsychologicalpressureinmentalhealthcarebasedonagroundedtheoryanalysisofinterviewswithserviceusers