Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Enlarged genital hiatus (GH) is associated with prolapse recurrence following prolapse repair. Perineorrhaphy is often performed to reduce GH. However, changes in GH between the time of surgery and follow up are poorly understood. Our primary aim was to compare the intra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonglack, Mildrede, Maetzold, Erin, Kenne, Kimberly A., Bradley, Catherine S., Kowalski, Joseph T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05157-x
_version_ 1784670823180664832
author Bonglack, Mildrede
Maetzold, Erin
Kenne, Kimberly A.
Bradley, Catherine S.
Kowalski, Joseph T.
author_facet Bonglack, Mildrede
Maetzold, Erin
Kenne, Kimberly A.
Bradley, Catherine S.
Kowalski, Joseph T.
author_sort Bonglack, Mildrede
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Enlarged genital hiatus (GH) is associated with prolapse recurrence following prolapse repair. Perineorrhaphy is often performed to reduce GH. However, changes in GH between the time of surgery and follow up are poorly understood. Our primary aim was to compare the intra-operative resting GH at the conclusion of surgery with the resting GH 3 months post-operatively in patients who undergo perineorrhaphy. We hypothesized that the intra-operative resting GH would be sustained. METHODS: Patients planning apical prolapse surgery were prospectively enrolled. Perineorrhaphy was performed at the surgeon’s discretion. GH was measured pre-operatively in clinic, intra-operatively before and after surgery (resting), and 3 months post-operatively (resting and Valsalva). RESULTS: Twenty-nine perineorrhaphy and 27 no perineorrhaphy patients completed 3-month follow-up. Groups were similar in age (63.9 y, SD 10.4), body mass index (28.3 kg/m(2), SD 5.2) and prior prolapse surgery (19.6%). Median (interquartile range) baseline Valsalva GH was larger in the perineorrhaphy group (4.5 (4 – 5.5) vs 3.5 (3 – 4) cm, p < 0.01). Median resting GH at 3 months was 0.5 cm less than end of surgery in the perineorrhaphy group (p < 0.01). The median change in GH between baseline and 3-month follow up was greater with perineorrhaphy (-1.5 vs -0.5 cm, p < 0.01). This difference was not seen in the sacrocolpopexy subgroup (-1.75 vs -1.5, p = 0.14; n = 24). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can be reassured that the intra-operative change in GH resulting from perineorrhaphy is sustained 3 months after surgery and similar to the more commonly measured preoperative to postoperative change in Valsalva GH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8929254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89292542022-03-17 Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair Bonglack, Mildrede Maetzold, Erin Kenne, Kimberly A. Bradley, Catherine S. Kowalski, Joseph T. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Enlarged genital hiatus (GH) is associated with prolapse recurrence following prolapse repair. Perineorrhaphy is often performed to reduce GH. However, changes in GH between the time of surgery and follow up are poorly understood. Our primary aim was to compare the intra-operative resting GH at the conclusion of surgery with the resting GH 3 months post-operatively in patients who undergo perineorrhaphy. We hypothesized that the intra-operative resting GH would be sustained. METHODS: Patients planning apical prolapse surgery were prospectively enrolled. Perineorrhaphy was performed at the surgeon’s discretion. GH was measured pre-operatively in clinic, intra-operatively before and after surgery (resting), and 3 months post-operatively (resting and Valsalva). RESULTS: Twenty-nine perineorrhaphy and 27 no perineorrhaphy patients completed 3-month follow-up. Groups were similar in age (63.9 y, SD 10.4), body mass index (28.3 kg/m(2), SD 5.2) and prior prolapse surgery (19.6%). Median (interquartile range) baseline Valsalva GH was larger in the perineorrhaphy group (4.5 (4 – 5.5) vs 3.5 (3 – 4) cm, p < 0.01). Median resting GH at 3 months was 0.5 cm less than end of surgery in the perineorrhaphy group (p < 0.01). The median change in GH between baseline and 3-month follow up was greater with perineorrhaphy (-1.5 vs -0.5 cm, p < 0.01). This difference was not seen in the sacrocolpopexy subgroup (-1.75 vs -1.5, p = 0.14; n = 24). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can be reassured that the intra-operative change in GH resulting from perineorrhaphy is sustained 3 months after surgery and similar to the more commonly measured preoperative to postoperative change in Valsalva GH. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8929254/ /pubmed/35301543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05157-x Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bonglack, Mildrede
Maetzold, Erin
Kenne, Kimberly A.
Bradley, Catherine S.
Kowalski, Joseph T.
Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title_full Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title_short Prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
title_sort prospective evaluation of genital hiatus in patients undergoing surgical prolapse repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05157-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bonglackmildrede prospectiveevaluationofgenitalhiatusinpatientsundergoingsurgicalprolapserepair
AT maetzolderin prospectiveevaluationofgenitalhiatusinpatientsundergoingsurgicalprolapserepair
AT kennekimberlya prospectiveevaluationofgenitalhiatusinpatientsundergoingsurgicalprolapserepair
AT bradleycatherines prospectiveevaluationofgenitalhiatusinpatientsundergoingsurgicalprolapserepair
AT kowalskijosepht prospectiveevaluationofgenitalhiatusinpatientsundergoingsurgicalprolapserepair