Cargando…
Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854 |
_version_ | 1784670835678642176 |
---|---|
author | Na, Mihwa O'Brien, Devin Lavelle, Maura Lee, Isabelle Gerberick, G. Frank Api, Anne Marie |
author_facet | Na, Mihwa O'Brien, Devin Lavelle, Maura Lee, Isabelle Gerberick, G. Frank Api, Anne Marie |
author_sort | Na, Mihwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the local lymph node assay. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials via weight of evidence approach, incorporating all available human, animal, in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data. METHODS: All available data on 106 fragrance materials were considered to assign each material into 1 of the 6 defined potency categories (extreme, strong, moderate, weak, very weak, and nonsensitizer). RESULTS: None of the 106 materials were considered an extreme sensitizer, whereas a total of 6, 23, 41, and 26 materials were categorized as strong, moderate, weak, and very weak sensitizers, respectively. Ten materials lacked evidence for the induction of skin sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Skin sensitization potency categorization of the 106 fragrance materials based on the described weight of evidence approach can serve as a useful resource in evaluation of nonanimal methods, as well as in risk assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8929305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89293052022-03-18 Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients Na, Mihwa O'Brien, Devin Lavelle, Maura Lee, Isabelle Gerberick, G. Frank Api, Anne Marie Dermatitis Studies Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the local lymph node assay. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials via weight of evidence approach, incorporating all available human, animal, in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data. METHODS: All available data on 106 fragrance materials were considered to assign each material into 1 of the 6 defined potency categories (extreme, strong, moderate, weak, very weak, and nonsensitizer). RESULTS: None of the 106 materials were considered an extreme sensitizer, whereas a total of 6, 23, 41, and 26 materials were categorized as strong, moderate, weak, and very weak sensitizers, respectively. Ten materials lacked evidence for the induction of skin sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Skin sensitization potency categorization of the 106 fragrance materials based on the described weight of evidence approach can serve as a useful resource in evaluation of nonanimal methods, as well as in risk assessment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8929305/ /pubmed/35170517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Contact Dermatitis Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Studies Na, Mihwa O'Brien, Devin Lavelle, Maura Lee, Isabelle Gerberick, G. Frank Api, Anne Marie Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title | Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title_full | Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title_fullStr | Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title_full_unstemmed | Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title_short | Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients |
title_sort | weight of evidence approach for skin sensitization potency categorization of fragrance ingredients |
topic | Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT namihwa weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients AT obriendevin weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients AT lavellemaura weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients AT leeisabelle weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients AT gerberickgfrank weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients AT apiannemarie weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients |