Cargando…

Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients

Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Na, Mihwa, O'Brien, Devin, Lavelle, Maura, Lee, Isabelle, Gerberick, G. Frank, Api, Anne Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854
_version_ 1784670835678642176
author Na, Mihwa
O'Brien, Devin
Lavelle, Maura
Lee, Isabelle
Gerberick, G. Frank
Api, Anne Marie
author_facet Na, Mihwa
O'Brien, Devin
Lavelle, Maura
Lee, Isabelle
Gerberick, G. Frank
Api, Anne Marie
author_sort Na, Mihwa
collection PubMed
description Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the local lymph node assay. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials via weight of evidence approach, incorporating all available human, animal, in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data. METHODS: All available data on 106 fragrance materials were considered to assign each material into 1 of the 6 defined potency categories (extreme, strong, moderate, weak, very weak, and nonsensitizer). RESULTS: None of the 106 materials were considered an extreme sensitizer, whereas a total of 6, 23, 41, and 26 materials were categorized as strong, moderate, weak, and very weak sensitizers, respectively. Ten materials lacked evidence for the induction of skin sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Skin sensitization potency categorization of the 106 fragrance materials based on the described weight of evidence approach can serve as a useful resource in evaluation of nonanimal methods, as well as in risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8929305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89293052022-03-18 Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients Na, Mihwa O'Brien, Devin Lavelle, Maura Lee, Isabelle Gerberick, G. Frank Api, Anne Marie Dermatitis Studies Reliable human potency data are necessary for conducting quantitative risk assessments, as well as development and validation of new nonanimal methods for skin sensitization assessments. Previously, human skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials was derived primarily from human data or the local lymph node assay. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define skin sensitization potency of fragrance materials via weight of evidence approach, incorporating all available human, animal, in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data. METHODS: All available data on 106 fragrance materials were considered to assign each material into 1 of the 6 defined potency categories (extreme, strong, moderate, weak, very weak, and nonsensitizer). RESULTS: None of the 106 materials were considered an extreme sensitizer, whereas a total of 6, 23, 41, and 26 materials were categorized as strong, moderate, weak, and very weak sensitizers, respectively. Ten materials lacked evidence for the induction of skin sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Skin sensitization potency categorization of the 106 fragrance materials based on the described weight of evidence approach can serve as a useful resource in evaluation of nonanimal methods, as well as in risk assessment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8929305/ /pubmed/35170517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Contact Dermatitis Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Studies
Na, Mihwa
O'Brien, Devin
Lavelle, Maura
Lee, Isabelle
Gerberick, G. Frank
Api, Anne Marie
Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title_full Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title_fullStr Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title_full_unstemmed Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title_short Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients
title_sort weight of evidence approach for skin sensitization potency categorization of fragrance ingredients
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000854
work_keys_str_mv AT namihwa weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients
AT obriendevin weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients
AT lavellemaura weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients
AT leeisabelle weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients
AT gerberickgfrank weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients
AT apiannemarie weightofevidenceapproachforskinsensitizationpotencycategorizationoffragranceingredients