Cargando…

Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care antigen tests (AgTs) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enable the rapid testing of infected individuals and are easy-to-use. However, there are few studies evaluating their clinical use. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seitz, Tamara, Lickefett, Benno, Traugott, Marianna, Pawelka, Erich, Karolyi, Mario, Baumgartner, Sebastian, Jansen-Skoupy, Sonja, Atamaniuk, Johanna, Fritsche-Polanz, Robert, Asenbaum, Johannes, Wenisch, Christoph, Födinger, Manuela, Zoufaly, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x
_version_ 1784670865374314496
author Seitz, Tamara
Lickefett, Benno
Traugott, Marianna
Pawelka, Erich
Karolyi, Mario
Baumgartner, Sebastian
Jansen-Skoupy, Sonja
Atamaniuk, Johanna
Fritsche-Polanz, Robert
Asenbaum, Johannes
Wenisch, Christoph
Födinger, Manuela
Zoufaly, Alexander
author_facet Seitz, Tamara
Lickefett, Benno
Traugott, Marianna
Pawelka, Erich
Karolyi, Mario
Baumgartner, Sebastian
Jansen-Skoupy, Sonja
Atamaniuk, Johanna
Fritsche-Polanz, Robert
Asenbaum, Johannes
Wenisch, Christoph
Födinger, Manuela
Zoufaly, Alexander
author_sort Seitz, Tamara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point-of-care antigen tests (AgTs) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enable the rapid testing of infected individuals and are easy-to-use. However, there are few studies evaluating their clinical use. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical performance characteristics of various commercial SARS-CoV-2 AgTs. DESIGN: The sensitivity of five AgTs, comprising four rapid antigen tests (RAT; AMP Rapid Test SARS-CoV-2 Ag, NADAL COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test, CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test) and one sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA; LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Assay), were evaluated in 300 nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used as a reference method. PARTICIPANTS: NP swabs were collected from patients admitted to hospital due to COVID-19. KEY RESULTS: Sensitivities of the AgTs ranged from 64.9 to 91.7% for samples with RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 30 and were 100% for cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 20. The highest sensitivity was observed for CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test. Multivariate analysis using time from symptom onset and the Ct value for AgT sensitivity showed an inverse correlation. Further, the female sex was an independent factor of lower RAT sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen tests from NP swab samples show high sensitivity in patients with a Ct value < 20. The best clinical sensitivity can be obtained using AgTs within the first 6 days after symptom onset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8929460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89294602022-03-18 Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting Seitz, Tamara Lickefett, Benno Traugott, Marianna Pawelka, Erich Karolyi, Mario Baumgartner, Sebastian Jansen-Skoupy, Sonja Atamaniuk, Johanna Fritsche-Polanz, Robert Asenbaum, Johannes Wenisch, Christoph Födinger, Manuela Zoufaly, Alexander J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Point-of-care antigen tests (AgTs) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enable the rapid testing of infected individuals and are easy-to-use. However, there are few studies evaluating their clinical use. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical performance characteristics of various commercial SARS-CoV-2 AgTs. DESIGN: The sensitivity of five AgTs, comprising four rapid antigen tests (RAT; AMP Rapid Test SARS-CoV-2 Ag, NADAL COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test, CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test) and one sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA; LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Assay), were evaluated in 300 nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used as a reference method. PARTICIPANTS: NP swabs were collected from patients admitted to hospital due to COVID-19. KEY RESULTS: Sensitivities of the AgTs ranged from 64.9 to 91.7% for samples with RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 30 and were 100% for cycle threshold (Ct) values lower than 20. The highest sensitivity was observed for CLINITEST Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test, and Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test. Multivariate analysis using time from symptom onset and the Ct value for AgT sensitivity showed an inverse correlation. Further, the female sex was an independent factor of lower RAT sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen tests from NP swab samples show high sensitivity in patients with a Ct value < 20. The best clinical sensitivity can be obtained using AgTs within the first 6 days after symptom onset. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-17 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8929460/ /pubmed/35301660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022
spellingShingle Original Research
Seitz, Tamara
Lickefett, Benno
Traugott, Marianna
Pawelka, Erich
Karolyi, Mario
Baumgartner, Sebastian
Jansen-Skoupy, Sonja
Atamaniuk, Johanna
Fritsche-Polanz, Robert
Asenbaum, Johannes
Wenisch, Christoph
Födinger, Manuela
Zoufaly, Alexander
Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title_full Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title_short Evaluation of Five Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests in a Clinical Setting
title_sort evaluation of five commercial sars-cov-2 antigen tests in a clinical setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07448-x
work_keys_str_mv AT seitztamara evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT lickefettbenno evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT traugottmarianna evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT pawelkaerich evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT karolyimario evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT baumgartnersebastian evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT jansenskoupysonja evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT atamaniukjohanna evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT fritschepolanzrobert evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT asenbaumjohannes evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT wenischchristoph evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT fodingermanuela evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting
AT zoufalyalexander evaluationoffivecommercialsarscov2antigentestsinaclinicalsetting