Cargando…
Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210 |
_version_ | 1784670875252948992 |
---|---|
author | Tirrell, Abigail R. Abu El Hawa, Areeg A. Bekeny, Jenna C. Chang, Brian L. Del Corral, Gabriel |
author_facet | Tirrell, Abigail R. Abu El Hawa, Areeg A. Bekeny, Jenna C. Chang, Brian L. Del Corral, Gabriel |
author_sort | Tirrell, Abigail R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures. METHODS: An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns. RESULTS: A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM. CONCLUSIONS: FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8929523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89295232022-03-21 Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes Tirrell, Abigail R. Abu El Hawa, Areeg A. Bekeny, Jenna C. Chang, Brian L. Del Corral, Gabriel Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Gender-Affirming Surgery BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures. METHODS: An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns. RESULTS: A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM. CONCLUSIONS: FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8929523/ /pubmed/35317453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Gender-Affirming Surgery Tirrell, Abigail R. Abu El Hawa, Areeg A. Bekeny, Jenna C. Chang, Brian L. Del Corral, Gabriel Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title | Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title_full | Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title_short | Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes |
title_sort | facial feminization surgery: a systematic review of perioperative surgical planning and outcomes |
topic | Gender-Affirming Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tirrellabigailr facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes AT abuelhawaareega facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes AT bekenyjennac facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes AT changbrianl facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes AT delcorralgabriel facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes |