Cargando…

Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tirrell, Abigail R., Abu El Hawa, Areeg A., Bekeny, Jenna C., Chang, Brian L., Del Corral, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210
_version_ 1784670875252948992
author Tirrell, Abigail R.
Abu El Hawa, Areeg A.
Bekeny, Jenna C.
Chang, Brian L.
Del Corral, Gabriel
author_facet Tirrell, Abigail R.
Abu El Hawa, Areeg A.
Bekeny, Jenna C.
Chang, Brian L.
Del Corral, Gabriel
author_sort Tirrell, Abigail R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures. METHODS: An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns. RESULTS: A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM. CONCLUSIONS: FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8929523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89295232022-03-21 Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes Tirrell, Abigail R. Abu El Hawa, Areeg A. Bekeny, Jenna C. Chang, Brian L. Del Corral, Gabriel Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Gender-Affirming Surgery BACKGROUND: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures. METHODS: An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns. RESULTS: A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM. CONCLUSIONS: FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8929523/ /pubmed/35317453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Gender-Affirming Surgery
Tirrell, Abigail R.
Abu El Hawa, Areeg A.
Bekeny, Jenna C.
Chang, Brian L.
Del Corral, Gabriel
Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title_full Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title_fullStr Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title_short Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes
title_sort facial feminization surgery: a systematic review of perioperative surgical planning and outcomes
topic Gender-Affirming Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004210
work_keys_str_mv AT tirrellabigailr facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes
AT abuelhawaareega facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes
AT bekenyjennac facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes
AT changbrianl facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes
AT delcorralgabriel facialfeminizationsurgeryasystematicreviewofperioperativesurgicalplanningandoutcomes