Cargando…

Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Racism has been identified as a major source of injustice and a health burden in Australia and across the world. Despite the surge in Australian quantitative research on the topic, and the increasing recognition of the prevalence and impact of racism in Australian society, the collective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben, Jehonathan, Elias, Amanuel, Issaka, Ayuba, Truong, Mandy, Dunn, Kevin, Sharples, Rachel, McGarty, Craig, Walton, Jessica, Mansouri, Fethi, Denson, Nida, Paradies, Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01919-2
_version_ 1784670919962132480
author Ben, Jehonathan
Elias, Amanuel
Issaka, Ayuba
Truong, Mandy
Dunn, Kevin
Sharples, Rachel
McGarty, Craig
Walton, Jessica
Mansouri, Fethi
Denson, Nida
Paradies, Yin
author_facet Ben, Jehonathan
Elias, Amanuel
Issaka, Ayuba
Truong, Mandy
Dunn, Kevin
Sharples, Rachel
McGarty, Craig
Walton, Jessica
Mansouri, Fethi
Denson, Nida
Paradies, Yin
author_sort Ben, Jehonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Racism has been identified as a major source of injustice and a health burden in Australia and across the world. Despite the surge in Australian quantitative research on the topic, and the increasing recognition of the prevalence and impact of racism in Australian society, the collective evidence base has yet to be comprehensively reviewed or meta-analysed. This protocol describes the first systematic review and meta-analysis of racism in Australia at the national level, focussing on quantitative studies. The current study will considerably improve our understanding of racism, including its manifestations and fluctuation over time, variation across settings and between groups, and associations with health and socio-economic outcomes. METHODS: The research will consist of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Searches for relevant studies will focus on the social and health science databases CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible papers for inclusion and extract data from included studies. Studies will be included in the review and meta-analysis where they meet the following criteria: (1) report quantitative empirical research on self-reported racism in Australia, (2) report data on the prevalence of racism, or its association with health (e.g. mental health, physical health, health behaviours) or socio-economic outcomes (e.g. education, employment, income), and (3) report Australian data. Measures of racism will focus on study participants’ self-reports, with a separate analysis dedicated to researcher-reported measures, such as segregation and differential outcomes across racial/ethnic groups. Measures of health and socio-economic outcomes will include both self-reports and researcher-reported measures, such as physiological measurements. Existing reviews will be manually searched for additional studies. Study characteristics will be summarised, and a meta-analysis of the prevalence of racism and its associations will be conducted using random effects models and mean weighted effect sizes. Moderation and subgroup analyses will be conducted as well. All analyses will use the software CMA 3.0. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a novel and comprehensive synthesis of the quantitative evidence base on racism in Australia. It will answer questions about the fluctuation of racism over time, its variation across settings and groups, and its relationship with health and socio-economic outcomes. Findings will be discussed in relation to broader debates in this growing field of research and will be widely disseminated to inform anti-racism research, action and policy nationally. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021265115. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01919-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8929717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89297172022-03-18 Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Ben, Jehonathan Elias, Amanuel Issaka, Ayuba Truong, Mandy Dunn, Kevin Sharples, Rachel McGarty, Craig Walton, Jessica Mansouri, Fethi Denson, Nida Paradies, Yin Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Racism has been identified as a major source of injustice and a health burden in Australia and across the world. Despite the surge in Australian quantitative research on the topic, and the increasing recognition of the prevalence and impact of racism in Australian society, the collective evidence base has yet to be comprehensively reviewed or meta-analysed. This protocol describes the first systematic review and meta-analysis of racism in Australia at the national level, focussing on quantitative studies. The current study will considerably improve our understanding of racism, including its manifestations and fluctuation over time, variation across settings and between groups, and associations with health and socio-economic outcomes. METHODS: The research will consist of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Searches for relevant studies will focus on the social and health science databases CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible papers for inclusion and extract data from included studies. Studies will be included in the review and meta-analysis where they meet the following criteria: (1) report quantitative empirical research on self-reported racism in Australia, (2) report data on the prevalence of racism, or its association with health (e.g. mental health, physical health, health behaviours) or socio-economic outcomes (e.g. education, employment, income), and (3) report Australian data. Measures of racism will focus on study participants’ self-reports, with a separate analysis dedicated to researcher-reported measures, such as segregation and differential outcomes across racial/ethnic groups. Measures of health and socio-economic outcomes will include both self-reports and researcher-reported measures, such as physiological measurements. Existing reviews will be manually searched for additional studies. Study characteristics will be summarised, and a meta-analysis of the prevalence of racism and its associations will be conducted using random effects models and mean weighted effect sizes. Moderation and subgroup analyses will be conducted as well. All analyses will use the software CMA 3.0. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a novel and comprehensive synthesis of the quantitative evidence base on racism in Australia. It will answer questions about the fluctuation of racism over time, its variation across settings and groups, and its relationship with health and socio-economic outcomes. Findings will be discussed in relation to broader debates in this growing field of research and will be widely disseminated to inform anti-racism research, action and policy nationally. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021265115. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01919-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8929717/ /pubmed/35300718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01919-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Ben, Jehonathan
Elias, Amanuel
Issaka, Ayuba
Truong, Mandy
Dunn, Kevin
Sharples, Rachel
McGarty, Craig
Walton, Jessica
Mansouri, Fethi
Denson, Nida
Paradies, Yin
Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Racism in Australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort racism in australia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8929717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01919-2
work_keys_str_mv AT benjehonathan racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eliasamanuel racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT issakaayuba racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT truongmandy racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dunnkevin racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sharplesrachel racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcgartycraig racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT waltonjessica racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mansourifethi racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT densonnida racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paradiesyin racisminaustraliaaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis