Cargando…

Job satisfaction among medical officers working in Delhi

BACKGROUND: Satisfied human resource is an essential asset for high productivity, efficiency, and quality of care in a healthcare organization. Job satisfaction among healthcare professionals assumes further significance for the purpose of maximization of human resource potential in the context of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Tanu, Kaur, Gurmeet, Gupta, Kalika, Thapliyal, Sunil, Lal, Panna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8930123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35309650
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_21
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Satisfied human resource is an essential asset for high productivity, efficiency, and quality of care in a healthcare organization. Job satisfaction among healthcare professionals assumes further significance for the purpose of maximization of human resource potential in the context of the shortage of manpower in the health sector in India. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess the job satisfaction among medical officers (MOs) working in Delhi and to study the factors influencing the satisfaction level amongst them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study conducted amongst selected MOs (by convenience) in all the districts of Delhi. A structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from the participants. RESULTS: A total of 115 MOs completed the questionnaire. There were 61 (53%) female doctors and 54 (47%) male doctors. The mean age of the study participants was 38.28 ± 7.37 years. The experience of the study group ranged between 1 and 28 years (9.59 ± 6.47 years). Of the total, 59.1% of participants were found to be satisfied with their job. The most common reason given for satisfaction with job was the timing of their job that suits them. The reason given for not being satisfied with job was salary not at par with work pressure. A significantly higher proportion of male participants considered “lack of accommodation” (P < 0.03) and “frequent detailment” (P < 0.031) are big problems faced in their jobs as compared with the female participants. Only 37 (32.2%) participants felt that the MO is able to give enough time to patients for clinical assessment in Out Patient Department. CONCLUSIONS: Although majority (59%) of the study group was satisfied with their job, there were numerous problems faced by the doctors at their workplace. Low pay was one of the important reasons cited for being dissatisfied. There is an urgent need to address all the factors affecting job satisfaction through proper planning and implementing relevant human resource policies for improvement in the work environment at public health institutions.