Cargando…

Determination of Optimal Fluoroscopic Angulations for Left Main Coronary Artery Ostial Interventions: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Validation

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for the best views for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostium intervention are empirical. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium using only fluoroscopy. METHODS: The optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Yuhe, Yu, Jie, Jing, Quanmin, Han, Yaling, Li, Yi, Xu, Kai, Qiu, Miaohan, Wang, Yingdong, Mintz, Gary S., Wang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8930230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2411824
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for the best views for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostium intervention are empirical. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium using only fluoroscopy. METHODS: The optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing the lowest points of the distal ends of two J tipped wires in the noncoronary cusp (NCC) and right coronary cusp (RCC). This was validated independently using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction. RESULTS: Satisfactory images of the overlapping wires in NCC and RCC could be obtained in 90% (45/50). Between the fluoroscopic and the 3D-CT reconstruction approaches, the mean difference for NCC and RCC overlapping at horizontal axes is -1.8 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.94 and 0.34 (p=0.10) and at vertical axes −1.6 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.46 and 0.26 (p=0.09); and the mean difference for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium at horizontal axes is −3.22 with a 95% limit of agreement between -7.26 and 0.81 (p=0.11) and at vertical axes −2.31 with a 95% limit of agreement between −5.83 and 1.21 (p=0.09). The 3D angulation deviation for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was 8.5° ± 4.7° when the LMCA ostium faced the NCC-RCC commissure (n = 32) and 22.3° ± 16.0° (p=0.009) when it did not (n = 13). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention can be determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC when the LMCA ostium faces the NCC-RCC commissure, as was the case in 71% of the patients studied.