Cargando…

Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review

The aim of this review was to report on the imaging modalities used to assess morphological and architectural properties of the m. triceps surae muscle in typically developing children, and the available reliability analyses. Scopus and MEDLINE (Pubmed) were searched systematically for all original...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Matthew, Al Masruri, Ghaliya, Fernandez, Justin, Williams, Sîan A., Agur, Anne M., Stott, Ngaire S., Hajarizadeh, Behzad, Mirjalili, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8930835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13584
_version_ 1784671122344640512
author Bell, Matthew
Al Masruri, Ghaliya
Fernandez, Justin
Williams, Sîan A.
Agur, Anne M.
Stott, Ngaire S.
Hajarizadeh, Behzad
Mirjalili, Ali
author_facet Bell, Matthew
Al Masruri, Ghaliya
Fernandez, Justin
Williams, Sîan A.
Agur, Anne M.
Stott, Ngaire S.
Hajarizadeh, Behzad
Mirjalili, Ali
author_sort Bell, Matthew
collection PubMed
description The aim of this review was to report on the imaging modalities used to assess morphological and architectural properties of the m. triceps surae muscle in typically developing children, and the available reliability analyses. Scopus and MEDLINE (Pubmed) were searched systematically for all original articles published up to September 2020 measuring morphological and architectural properties of the m. triceps surae in typically developing children (18 years or under). Thirty eligible studies were included in this analysis, measuring fibre bundle length (FBL) (n = 11), pennation angle (PA) (n = 10), muscle volume (MV) (n = 16) and physiological cross‐sectional area (PCSA) (n = 4). Three primary imaging modalities were utilised to assess these architectural parameters in vivo: two‐dimensional ultrasound (2DUS; n = 12), three‐dimensional ultrasound (3DUS; n = 9) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 6). The mean age of participants ranged from 1.4 years to 18 years old. There was an apparent increase in m. gastrocnemius medialis MV and pCSA with age; however, no trend was evident with FBL or PA. Analysis of correlations of muscle variables with age was limited by a lack of longitudinal data and methodological variations between studies affecting outcomes. Only five studies evaluated the reliability of the methods. Imaging methodologies such as MRI and US may provide valuable insight into the development of skeletal muscle from childhood to adulthood; however, variations in methodological approaches can significantly influence outcomes. Researchers wishing to develop a model of typical muscle development should carry out longitudinal architectural assessment of all muscles comprising the m. triceps surae utilising a consistent approach that minimises confounding errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8930835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89308352022-03-24 Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review Bell, Matthew Al Masruri, Ghaliya Fernandez, Justin Williams, Sîan A. Agur, Anne M. Stott, Ngaire S. Hajarizadeh, Behzad Mirjalili, Ali J Anat Review Articles The aim of this review was to report on the imaging modalities used to assess morphological and architectural properties of the m. triceps surae muscle in typically developing children, and the available reliability analyses. Scopus and MEDLINE (Pubmed) were searched systematically for all original articles published up to September 2020 measuring morphological and architectural properties of the m. triceps surae in typically developing children (18 years or under). Thirty eligible studies were included in this analysis, measuring fibre bundle length (FBL) (n = 11), pennation angle (PA) (n = 10), muscle volume (MV) (n = 16) and physiological cross‐sectional area (PCSA) (n = 4). Three primary imaging modalities were utilised to assess these architectural parameters in vivo: two‐dimensional ultrasound (2DUS; n = 12), three‐dimensional ultrasound (3DUS; n = 9) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 6). The mean age of participants ranged from 1.4 years to 18 years old. There was an apparent increase in m. gastrocnemius medialis MV and pCSA with age; however, no trend was evident with FBL or PA. Analysis of correlations of muscle variables with age was limited by a lack of longitudinal data and methodological variations between studies affecting outcomes. Only five studies evaluated the reliability of the methods. Imaging methodologies such as MRI and US may provide valuable insight into the development of skeletal muscle from childhood to adulthood; however, variations in methodological approaches can significantly influence outcomes. Researchers wishing to develop a model of typical muscle development should carry out longitudinal architectural assessment of all muscles comprising the m. triceps surae utilising a consistent approach that minimises confounding errors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-08 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8930835/ /pubmed/34750816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13584 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Bell, Matthew
Al Masruri, Ghaliya
Fernandez, Justin
Williams, Sîan A.
Agur, Anne M.
Stott, Ngaire S.
Hajarizadeh, Behzad
Mirjalili, Ali
Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title_full Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title_fullStr Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title_short Typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: A narrative review
title_sort typical m. triceps surae morphology and architecture measurement from 0 to 18 years: a narrative review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8930835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13584
work_keys_str_mv AT bellmatthew typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT almasrurighaliya typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT fernandezjustin typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT williamssiana typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT agurannem typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT stottngaires typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT hajarizadehbehzad typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview
AT mirjaliliali typicalmtricepssuraemorphologyandarchitecturemeasurementfrom0to18yearsanarrativereview