Meniscus position and size in knees with versus without structural knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether and which quantitative 3D measures of medial and/or lateral meniscus position and size are associated with subsequent medial femorotibial structural progression of knee osteoarthritis and to determine the correlation between central slice and total meniscus measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Knees with radiographic osteoarthritis from Osteoarthritis Initiative participants with longitudinal medial MRI-based cartilage thickness and radiographic joint space width (JSW) loss over 12 months were selected. These 37 structural progressor knees (64.7 ± 8.0y, 30.2 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), 35% men) were matched 1:1 to 37 non-progressor knees (64.6 ± 9.8y, 30.2 ± 4.4 kg/m(2), 35% men) without cartilage thickness or JSW loss. Quantitative measures of meniscus position and size were computed from manual segmentations of coronal baseline MRIs. Cohen’s D was used as measure of effect size. RESULTS: Maximum extrusion distance of the total medial meniscus and mean extrusion in the central 5 and in the central slice were greater for progressor than non-progressor knees (Cohen’s D 0.58–0.66). No significant differences were observed for medial tibial coverage or mean extrusion (entire meniscus). Among medial meniscus morphology measures, only mean height differed between progressor vs non-progressor knees (Cohen’s D 0.40). Among lateral meniscus measures, height and volume were greater in progressor vs. non-progressor knees (Cohen’s D 0.46–0.83). Mean extrusion measures were highly correlated between the entire meniscus and the central (r = 0.88) or the central 5 (r = 0.93) slices. CONCLUSIONS: 3D maximum and central medial meniscus extrusion may serve as predictors for subsequent structural progression. Central meniscus extrusion measures could substitute 3D extrusion measurement across the entire meniscus.