Cargando…

Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Fernández, Sergio, Pablo-Marcos, Daniel, de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco, Rodríguez, María José Reina, Gozalo, Mónica, Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús, Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel, Calvo, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683
_version_ 1784671363737321472
author García-Fernández, Sergio
Pablo-Marcos, Daniel
de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco
Rodríguez, María José Reina
Gozalo, Mónica
Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús
Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel
Calvo, Jorge
author_facet García-Fernández, Sergio
Pablo-Marcos, Daniel
de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco
Rodríguez, María José Reina
Gozalo, Mónica
Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús
Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel
Calvo, Jorge
author_sort García-Fernández, Sergio
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8931994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89319942022-03-18 Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department García-Fernández, Sergio Pablo-Marcos, Daniel de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco Rodríguez, María José Reina Gozalo, Mónica Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel Calvo, Jorge Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department. Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8931994/ /pubmed/35421760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
García-Fernández, Sergio
Pablo-Marcos, Daniel
de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco
Rodríguez, María José Reina
Gozalo, Mónica
Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús
Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel
Calvo, Jorge
Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title_full Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title_fullStr Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title_short Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
title_sort evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test standard f covid-19 ag fia for diagnosing sars-cov-2: experience from an emergency department
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683
work_keys_str_mv AT garciafernandezsergio evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT pablomarcosdaniel evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT delafuentesilviavelasco evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT rodriguezmariajosereina evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT gozalomonica evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT rodriguezlozanojesus evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT mendezlegazajosemanuel evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment
AT calvojorge evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment