Cargando…
Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683 |
_version_ | 1784671363737321472 |
---|---|
author | García-Fernández, Sergio Pablo-Marcos, Daniel de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco Rodríguez, María José Reina Gozalo, Mónica Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel Calvo, Jorge |
author_facet | García-Fernández, Sergio Pablo-Marcos, Daniel de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco Rodríguez, María José Reina Gozalo, Mónica Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel Calvo, Jorge |
author_sort | García-Fernández, Sergio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8931994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89319942022-03-18 Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department García-Fernández, Sergio Pablo-Marcos, Daniel de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco Rodríguez, María José Reina Gozalo, Mónica Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel Calvo, Jorge Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department. Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8931994/ /pubmed/35421760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article García-Fernández, Sergio Pablo-Marcos, Daniel de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco Rodríguez, María José Reina Gozalo, Mónica Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel Calvo, Jorge Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title | Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title_full | Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title_short | Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department |
title_sort | evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test standard f covid-19 ag fia for diagnosing sars-cov-2: experience from an emergency department |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciafernandezsergio evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT pablomarcosdaniel evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT delafuentesilviavelasco evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT rodriguezmariajosereina evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT gozalomonica evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT rodriguezlozanojesus evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT mendezlegazajosemanuel evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment AT calvojorge evaluationoftherapidantigendetectionteststandardfcovid19agfiafordiagnosingsarscov2experiencefromanemergencydepartment |