Cargando…

A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klett, Dane E., Alom, Manaf, Wymer, Kevin, Potretzke, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6 ). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging.