Cargando…
A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499 |
_version_ | 1784671371556552704 |
---|---|
author | Klett, Dane E. Alom, Manaf Wymer, Kevin Potretzke, Aaron |
author_facet | Klett, Dane E. Alom, Manaf Wymer, Kevin Potretzke, Aaron |
author_sort | Klett, Dane E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6 ). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8932032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89320322022-03-18 A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” Klett, Dane E. Alom, Manaf Wymer, Kevin Potretzke, Aaron Int Braz J Urol Video Section INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6 ). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8932032/ /pubmed/34907769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Video Section Klett, Dane E. Alom, Manaf Wymer, Kevin Potretzke, Aaron A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title | A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title_full | A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title_fullStr | A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title_short | A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
title_sort | novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” |
topic | Video Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klettdanee anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT alommanaf anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT wymerkevin anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT potretzkeaaron anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT klettdanee noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT alommanaf noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT wymerkevin noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle AT potretzkeaaron noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle |