Cargando…

A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klett, Dane E., Alom, Manaf, Wymer, Kevin, Potretzke, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499
_version_ 1784671371556552704
author Klett, Dane E.
Alom, Manaf
Wymer, Kevin
Potretzke, Aaron
author_facet Klett, Dane E.
Alom, Manaf
Wymer, Kevin
Potretzke, Aaron
author_sort Klett, Dane E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6 ). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89320322022-03-18 A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle” Klett, Dane E. Alom, Manaf Wymer, Kevin Potretzke, Aaron Int Braz J Urol Video Section INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies ( 1 – 3 ). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket ( 4 – 6 ). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. RESULTS: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8932032/ /pubmed/34907769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Video Section
Klett, Dane E.
Alom, Manaf
Wymer, Kevin
Potretzke, Aaron
A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title_full A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title_fullStr A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title_full_unstemmed A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title_short A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
title_sort novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the “form tackle”
topic Video Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0499
work_keys_str_mv AT klettdanee anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT alommanaf anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT wymerkevin anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT potretzkeaaron anoveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT klettdanee noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT alommanaf noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT wymerkevin noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle
AT potretzkeaaron noveluppertractureteroscopicbiopsytechniquetheformtackle