Cargando…

Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this proces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Matt X., Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara, Wamala Andersson, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x
_version_ 1784671386377125888
author Richardson, Matt X.
Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara
Wamala Andersson, Sarah
author_facet Richardson, Matt X.
Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara
Wamala Andersson, Sarah
author_sort Richardson, Matt X.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this process may be lacking. METHOD: This study investigated the use of evidence as a requirement in public sector tendering process of HWT, and how it affected bidder attributes and procurement outcomes. A novel type of systematic review and content analysis of requests for tenders for HWT announced prior to June 2021 was therefore conducted in Swedish public procurement databases. RESULT: Ninety requests for tenders for 11 types of HWT met the inclusion criteria for review, accounting for potential contracts worth 246 to 296 million EUR. Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness were used in 16 requests for tenders, accounting for 183 million EUR in potential contracts. Eight of the requests referred to an established independent standard to confirm such evidence, such as CE standard of conformity, MDR and/or MDD. This prevalence appears to cut across all types of procuring organisations and all types of HWT. The use of any evidence criteria, or lack thereof, does not appear to affect the outcomes of the tendering process. CONCLUSION: Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness are used in less than a fifth of all public procurements of health- and welfare technologies in Sweden, and less than 10% refer to some form of independent standard as confirmation of such evidence. The procurement process therefore risks creating a legacy of sub-optimal technologies in health- and social care services. More prevalent and specific requirements for evidence and its continual generation in the procurement process are highly recommended. Recommendations for decision makers, procurement managers, and developers are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89321002022-03-23 Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review Richardson, Matt X. Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Wamala Andersson, Sarah BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this process may be lacking. METHOD: This study investigated the use of evidence as a requirement in public sector tendering process of HWT, and how it affected bidder attributes and procurement outcomes. A novel type of systematic review and content analysis of requests for tenders for HWT announced prior to June 2021 was therefore conducted in Swedish public procurement databases. RESULT: Ninety requests for tenders for 11 types of HWT met the inclusion criteria for review, accounting for potential contracts worth 246 to 296 million EUR. Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness were used in 16 requests for tenders, accounting for 183 million EUR in potential contracts. Eight of the requests referred to an established independent standard to confirm such evidence, such as CE standard of conformity, MDR and/or MDD. This prevalence appears to cut across all types of procuring organisations and all types of HWT. The use of any evidence criteria, or lack thereof, does not appear to affect the outcomes of the tendering process. CONCLUSION: Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness are used in less than a fifth of all public procurements of health- and welfare technologies in Sweden, and less than 10% refer to some form of independent standard as confirmation of such evidence. The procurement process therefore risks creating a legacy of sub-optimal technologies in health- and social care services. More prevalent and specific requirements for evidence and its continual generation in the procurement process are highly recommended. Recommendations for decision makers, procurement managers, and developers are provided. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8932100/ /pubmed/35300663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Richardson, Matt X.
Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara
Wamala Andersson, Sarah
Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title_full Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title_fullStr Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title_short Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
title_sort evidence-related requirements in swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonmattx evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview
AT landerdahlstridsbergsara evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview
AT wamalaanderssonsarah evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview