Cargando…
Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this proces...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x |
_version_ | 1784671386377125888 |
---|---|
author | Richardson, Matt X. Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Wamala Andersson, Sarah |
author_facet | Richardson, Matt X. Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Wamala Andersson, Sarah |
author_sort | Richardson, Matt X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this process may be lacking. METHOD: This study investigated the use of evidence as a requirement in public sector tendering process of HWT, and how it affected bidder attributes and procurement outcomes. A novel type of systematic review and content analysis of requests for tenders for HWT announced prior to June 2021 was therefore conducted in Swedish public procurement databases. RESULT: Ninety requests for tenders for 11 types of HWT met the inclusion criteria for review, accounting for potential contracts worth 246 to 296 million EUR. Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness were used in 16 requests for tenders, accounting for 183 million EUR in potential contracts. Eight of the requests referred to an established independent standard to confirm such evidence, such as CE standard of conformity, MDR and/or MDD. This prevalence appears to cut across all types of procuring organisations and all types of HWT. The use of any evidence criteria, or lack thereof, does not appear to affect the outcomes of the tendering process. CONCLUSION: Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness are used in less than a fifth of all public procurements of health- and welfare technologies in Sweden, and less than 10% refer to some form of independent standard as confirmation of such evidence. The procurement process therefore risks creating a legacy of sub-optimal technologies in health- and social care services. More prevalent and specific requirements for evidence and its continual generation in the procurement process are highly recommended. Recommendations for decision makers, procurement managers, and developers are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8932100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89321002022-03-23 Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review Richardson, Matt X. Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Wamala Andersson, Sarah BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are becoming increasingly employed in the Nordic countries, and in Sweden in particular. The amount of HWT public procurement is likely increasing at a similar rate, but requirements for evidence for effectiveness placed on bidders during this process may be lacking. METHOD: This study investigated the use of evidence as a requirement in public sector tendering process of HWT, and how it affected bidder attributes and procurement outcomes. A novel type of systematic review and content analysis of requests for tenders for HWT announced prior to June 2021 was therefore conducted in Swedish public procurement databases. RESULT: Ninety requests for tenders for 11 types of HWT met the inclusion criteria for review, accounting for potential contracts worth 246 to 296 million EUR. Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness were used in 16 requests for tenders, accounting for 183 million EUR in potential contracts. Eight of the requests referred to an established independent standard to confirm such evidence, such as CE standard of conformity, MDR and/or MDD. This prevalence appears to cut across all types of procuring organisations and all types of HWT. The use of any evidence criteria, or lack thereof, does not appear to affect the outcomes of the tendering process. CONCLUSION: Criteria requiring evidence for effectiveness are used in less than a fifth of all public procurements of health- and welfare technologies in Sweden, and less than 10% refer to some form of independent standard as confirmation of such evidence. The procurement process therefore risks creating a legacy of sub-optimal technologies in health- and social care services. More prevalent and specific requirements for evidence and its continual generation in the procurement process are highly recommended. Recommendations for decision makers, procurement managers, and developers are provided. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8932100/ /pubmed/35300663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Richardson, Matt X. Landerdahl Stridsberg, Sara Wamala Andersson, Sarah Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title | Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title_full | Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title_short | Evidence-related requirements in Swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
title_sort | evidence-related requirements in swedish public sector procurement of health and welfare technologies – a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07723-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardsonmattx evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview AT landerdahlstridsbergsara evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview AT wamalaanderssonsarah evidencerelatedrequirementsinswedishpublicsectorprocurementofhealthandwelfaretechnologiesasystematicreview |