Cargando…
A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment
BACKGROUND: Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion is straining and mechanically inefficient, often leading to upper limb complaints. Previous push–pull lever propulsion mechanisms have shown to perform better or equal in efficiency and physiological strain. Propulsion biomechanics have not been evaluated t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01007-5 |
_version_ | 1784671390401560576 |
---|---|
author | le Rütte, Thomas A. Trigo, Fransisca Bessems, Luca van der Woude, Lucas H. V. Vegter, Riemer J. K. |
author_facet | le Rütte, Thomas A. Trigo, Fransisca Bessems, Luca van der Woude, Lucas H. V. Vegter, Riemer J. K. |
author_sort | le Rütte, Thomas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion is straining and mechanically inefficient, often leading to upper limb complaints. Previous push–pull lever propulsion mechanisms have shown to perform better or equal in efficiency and physiological strain. Propulsion biomechanics have not been evaluated thus far. A novel push–pull central-lever propulsion mechanism is compared to conventional hand-rim wheelchair propulsion, using both physiological and biomechanical outcomes under low-intensity steady-state conditions on a motor driven treadmill. METHODS: In this 5 day (distributed over a maximum of 21 days) between-group experiment, 30 able-bodied novices performed 60 min (5 × 3 × 4 min) of practice in either the push–pull central lever wheelchair (n = 15) or the hand-rim wheelchair (n = 15). At the first and final sessions cardiopulmonary strain, propulsion kinematics and force production were determined in both instrumented propulsion mechanisms. Repeated measures ANOVA evaluated between (propulsion mechanism type), within (over practice) and interaction effects. RESULTS: Over practice, both groups significantly improved on all outcome measures. After practice the peak forces during the push and pull phase of lever propulsion were considerably lower compared to those in the handrim push phase (42 ± 10 & 46 ± 10 vs 63 ± 21N). Concomitantly, energy expenditure was found to be lower as well (263 ± 45 vs 298 ± 59W), on the other hand gross mechanical efficiency (6.4 ± 1.5 vs 5.9 ± 1.3%), heart-rate (97 ± 10 vs 98 ± 10 bpm) and perceived exertion (9 ± 2 vs 10 ± 1) were not significantly different between modes. CONCLUSION: The current study shows the potential benefits of the newly designed push–pull central-lever propulsion mechanism over regular hand rim wheelchair propulsion. The much lower forces and energy expenditure might help to reduce the strain on the upper extremities and thus prevent the development of overuse injury. This proof of concept in a controlled laboratory experiment warrants continued experimental research in wheelchair-users during daily life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8932120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89321202022-03-23 A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment le Rütte, Thomas A. Trigo, Fransisca Bessems, Luca van der Woude, Lucas H. V. Vegter, Riemer J. K. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion is straining and mechanically inefficient, often leading to upper limb complaints. Previous push–pull lever propulsion mechanisms have shown to perform better or equal in efficiency and physiological strain. Propulsion biomechanics have not been evaluated thus far. A novel push–pull central-lever propulsion mechanism is compared to conventional hand-rim wheelchair propulsion, using both physiological and biomechanical outcomes under low-intensity steady-state conditions on a motor driven treadmill. METHODS: In this 5 day (distributed over a maximum of 21 days) between-group experiment, 30 able-bodied novices performed 60 min (5 × 3 × 4 min) of practice in either the push–pull central lever wheelchair (n = 15) or the hand-rim wheelchair (n = 15). At the first and final sessions cardiopulmonary strain, propulsion kinematics and force production were determined in both instrumented propulsion mechanisms. Repeated measures ANOVA evaluated between (propulsion mechanism type), within (over practice) and interaction effects. RESULTS: Over practice, both groups significantly improved on all outcome measures. After practice the peak forces during the push and pull phase of lever propulsion were considerably lower compared to those in the handrim push phase (42 ± 10 & 46 ± 10 vs 63 ± 21N). Concomitantly, energy expenditure was found to be lower as well (263 ± 45 vs 298 ± 59W), on the other hand gross mechanical efficiency (6.4 ± 1.5 vs 5.9 ± 1.3%), heart-rate (97 ± 10 vs 98 ± 10 bpm) and perceived exertion (9 ± 2 vs 10 ± 1) were not significantly different between modes. CONCLUSION: The current study shows the potential benefits of the newly designed push–pull central-lever propulsion mechanism over regular hand rim wheelchair propulsion. The much lower forces and energy expenditure might help to reduce the strain on the upper extremities and thus prevent the development of overuse injury. This proof of concept in a controlled laboratory experiment warrants continued experimental research in wheelchair-users during daily life. BioMed Central 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8932120/ /pubmed/35300710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01007-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research le Rütte, Thomas A. Trigo, Fransisca Bessems, Luca van der Woude, Lucas H. V. Vegter, Riemer J. K. A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title | A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title_full | A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title_fullStr | A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title_short | A novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
title_sort | novel push–pull central-lever mechanism reduces peak forces and energy-cost compared to hand-rim wheelchair propulsion during a controlled lab-based experiment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01007-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leruttethomasa anovelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT trigofransisca anovelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT bessemsluca anovelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT vanderwoudelucashv anovelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT vegterriemerjk anovelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT leruttethomasa novelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT trigofransisca novelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT bessemsluca novelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT vanderwoudelucashv novelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment AT vegterriemerjk novelpushpullcentrallevermechanismreducespeakforcesandenergycostcomparedtohandrimwheelchairpropulsionduringacontrolledlabbasedexperiment |