Cargando…

Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient’s preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. Mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haugom, Espen W., Stensrud, Bjørn, Beston, Gro, Ruud, Torleif, Landheim, Anne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
_version_ 1784671399551434752
author Haugom, Espen W.
Stensrud, Bjørn
Beston, Gro
Ruud, Torleif
Landheim, Anne S.
author_facet Haugom, Espen W.
Stensrud, Bjørn
Beston, Gro
Ruud, Torleif
Landheim, Anne S.
author_sort Haugom, Espen W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient’s preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients’ experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89321702022-03-23 Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study Haugom, Espen W. Stensrud, Bjørn Beston, Gro Ruud, Torleif Landheim, Anne S. BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient’s preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients’ experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care. BioMed Central 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8932170/ /pubmed/35300633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Haugom, Espen W.
Stensrud, Bjørn
Beston, Gro
Ruud, Torleif
Landheim, Anne S.
Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title_full Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title_short Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study
title_sort experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in norway: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
work_keys_str_mv AT haugomespenw experiencesofshareddecisionmakingamongpatientswithpsychoticdisordersinnorwayaqualitativestudy
AT stensrudbjørn experiencesofshareddecisionmakingamongpatientswithpsychoticdisordersinnorwayaqualitativestudy
AT bestongro experiencesofshareddecisionmakingamongpatientswithpsychoticdisordersinnorwayaqualitativestudy
AT ruudtorleif experiencesofshareddecisionmakingamongpatientswithpsychoticdisordersinnorwayaqualitativestudy
AT landheimannes experiencesofshareddecisionmakingamongpatientswithpsychoticdisordersinnorwayaqualitativestudy