Cargando…

Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors

BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Igarashi, Yuko, Tanaka, Yuta, Ito, Kaori, Miyashita, Mitsunori, Kinoshita, Satomi, Kato, Akane, Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8
_version_ 1784671403003346944
author Igarashi, Yuko
Tanaka, Yuta
Ito, Kaori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Kinoshita, Satomi
Kato, Akane
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Igarashi, Yuko
Tanaka, Yuta
Ito, Kaori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Kinoshita, Satomi
Kato, Akane
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Igarashi, Yuko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. RESULTS: Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32–41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28–37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21–29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17–24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2–6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the “prediction of prognosis by clinician’s experience” (54%, 95% CI: 50–59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27–36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89321862022-03-23 Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors Igarashi, Yuko Tanaka, Yuta Ito, Kaori Miyashita, Mitsunori Kinoshita, Satomi Kato, Akane Kizawa, Yoshiyuki J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown how widespread is the practice of palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. This study aimed to determine evaluate the delivery and self-reported practice of palliative care in ICUs in Japan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to the physician directors of all 873 ICUs in Japan in August 2020. RESULTS: Of the 873 institutions, 439 responded the questionnaire (response rate: 50%) and 413 responses were included in the analysis. The responding physicians thought palliative care was appropriate for physical symptoms (36%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 32–41), the provision of information (32%, 95% CI: 28–37), psychological distress (25%, 95% CI: 21–29) and in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) prevention (20%, 95% CI: 17–24). Only 4% (95% CI: 2–6) of participants indicated that they always provided palliative care screening for the patients admitted to the ICU. The most common method to determine eligibility for palliative care was the “prediction of prognosis by clinician’s experience” (54%, 95% CI: 50–59). Thirty-one percent (95% CI: 27–36) of participants responded that there was no clear method used to decide which patients need palliative care. Fifty-four percent of the participants answered they had no standardized protocols for symptom management at all. Less than 5% answered they had standardized protocols for end-of-life symptom management or terminal weaning off mechanical ventilation including extubation of endotracheal tubes. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, the dissemination of palliative care and its integration into ICU care appears insufficient. To improve the quality of life of patients who are admitted to ICU, it may be useful to implement palliative care screening and multidisciplinary conferences, to develop standardized protocols for symptom management and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, and to educate primary palliative care for all ICU physicians. BioMed Central 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8932186/ /pubmed/35303967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Igarashi, Yuko
Tanaka, Yuta
Ito, Kaori
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Kinoshita, Satomi
Kato, Akane
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title_full Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title_fullStr Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title_full_unstemmed Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title_short Current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in ICUs in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
title_sort current status of palliative care delivery and self-reported practice in icus in japan: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of physician directors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00605-8
work_keys_str_mv AT igarashiyuko currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT tanakayuta currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT itokaori currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT miyashitamitsunori currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT kinoshitasatomi currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT katoakane currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors
AT kizawayoshiyuki currentstatusofpalliativecaredeliveryandselfreportedpracticeinicusinjapananationwidecrosssectionalsurveyofphysiciandirectors